Upgrade to openssl-1.0.2a (Part1) #1325

shigeki · 2015-04-02T16:23:07Z

This is a resubmitted PR of #723. It still stays in 1.0.1m but requires the following 5 changes just before upgrading 1.0.2a.

upgrade gyp to use else if conditions as supported in https://codereview.chromium.org/601353002
refactor openssl.gyp so as to switch target_arch and OS with "else if" condition
move sources, rules and defines into openssl.gypi, openssl-cli.gypi and masm_compile.gypi
apply two private patches to fix gyp to run on MacOS without XCode and Fedor's fix for python2.6.
add rsa and aes-gcm benchmarks and new hash algorithms in order to compare the performances after upgrade.

I confirmed there is no differences in out/deps/openssl/openssl.target.mk with this changes on several platforms.

CI shows that there are a few new errors on win2008r2 but they are not related to this change. Others are fine except known failures.
https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/iojs+any-pr+multi/430/

After this, I will submit the 2nd PR to finish upgrade to 1.0.2a in https://github.com/shigeki/io.js/tree/upgrade_openssl102a.
Preliminary results to show performance gains after upgrade are in https://gist.github.com/shigeki/eefc31f9d82f45f9a8e3 .

R= @bnoordhuis @indutny

fix nodejs#6859

This issue has already submitted to the upstream in https://code.google.com/p/gyp/issues/detail?id=477 Use this commit until the upstream is to be fixed.

indutny · 2015-04-02T16:49:07Z

Some nits otherwise LGTM. @bnoordhuis PTAL too.

bnoordhuis · 2015-04-02T20:33:03Z

Left some comments. Mostly LGTM though.

I'm not quite sure why it was necessary to split up openssl.gyp. Can you explain?

shigeki · 2015-04-03T00:20:22Z

@bnoordhuis @indutny Thanks for reviewing. I will fix them soon.
The reasons why I splited up openssl.gyp are that

Sources and defines in openssl.gyp are getting so huge because of increase of supported architectures such as arms and two sets of asm files, one is for the latest avx2 supported compiler and the other is for the older.
We can only focus and modify the changes of sources and defines of openssl.gypi in version up and less worries about platform dependent logics that are defined in openssl.gyp.
It's easy to add a new supported architecture. For example, adding armv8 is as blow in openssl.gyp, where it's easy to debug and identify issues when they occur.

@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@
                 '<@(openssl_defines_x64_elf)',
               ],
               'sources': ['<@(openssl_sources_x64_elf_gas)'],
+            }, 'target_arch=="arm64"', {
+              'defines': ['<@(openssl_defines_arm64)',],
+              'sources': ['<@(openssl_sources_arm64_linux64_gas)'],
             }, { # else other archtectures does not use asm
               'defines': [
                 'OPENSSL_NO_ASM',

Updated gyp has "else if" syntax in condition. Use this for target_arch and OS switches. Several sources, defines, rules and libraries variables moved to gypi files.

add sha1, sha512 algorithm and remove md5

shigeki · 2015-04-03T02:48:29Z

Styles are fixed by checking with gjslint. Other fixes are made according comments and I replied them. The branch are force pushed.

@bnoordhuis Could you give me an another LGTM if you accept my explanations above?

rvagg · 2015-04-03T07:19:23Z

very exciting, I won't lgtm because this is out of my area but does this reenable openssl on armv8 as well? my understanding is that 1.0.2 should give us the support we need there.

shigeki · 2015-04-03T07:40:27Z

@rvagg The armv8 support with assembler codes has already been done in the forthcoming commits as shigeki@d133ae5 and shigeki@1cca321. Could you install automake and libtool on the armv8 host in Jenkins for libuv tests? After resolving the build failure of libuv in https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/libuv+any-pr+multi/nodes=iojs-armv8-ubuntu1404/lastBuild/console, I can work spawnSync failures on armv8 with shigeki@5baf3dd .

jbergstroem · 2015-04-03T08:37:40Z

I'm very happy about the split tbh -- makes it so much more manageable.

bnoordhuis · 2015-04-03T10:39:58Z

LGTM

rvagg · 2015-04-03T11:18:21Z

@shigeki sorry, I think this is good to go now but the state of libuv tests on armv8 is apparently pretty tragic! https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/libuv+any-pr+multi/74/nodes=iojs-armv8-ubuntu1404/console /cc @libuv/owners

rvagg · 2015-04-03T11:19:07Z

perhaps @libuv/owners isn't right here, anyway, cc @saghul

bnoordhuis · 2015-04-03T11:33:59Z

@rvagg If you can give me a login for the armv8 bot, I can look into it. I'm 95% sure I know what's wrong but I need some time with strace to confirm.

indutny · 2015-04-03T11:54:54Z

LGTM

rvagg · 2015-04-03T12:26:56Z

@bnoordhuis will have to do this later, it's behind a jump-host that's set up just with my creds so I'll probably need to make an ssh tunnel to let you in to it.

Fishrock123 · 2015-04-04T01:46:01Z

@shigeki this doesn't look semver-minor though? It looks fine for a x.y.patch to me?

shigeki · 2015-04-04T01:54:08Z

@Fishrock123 Yes, it does not contain API changes. But I wonder it makes some confusion as this title is the first part of upgrading of the deps library. If you don't mind, I will merge this right now.

Fishrock123 · 2015-04-04T03:11:52Z

@shigeki Well, the commits themselves are fairly self explanatory, maybe don't squash?

shigeki · 2015-04-04T03:14:18Z

@Fishrock123 No, I don't squash them. I will merge each ones separately.

PR-URL: #1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

Fixes: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#6859 PR-URL: #1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Shigeki Ohtsu <[email protected]>

This issue has already submitted to the upstream in https://code.google.com/p/gyp/issues/detail?id=477 Use this commit until the upstream is to be fixed. PR-URL: #1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

Updated gyp has "else if" syntax in condition. Use this for target_arch and OS switches. Several sources, defines, rules and libraries variables moved to gypi files. PR-URL: #1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

This LTS release comes with 113 commits, 56 of which are doc related, 18 of which are build / tooling related, 16 of which are test related and 7 which are benchmark related. Notable Changes: * build: - Updated Logos for the OSX + Windows installers - (Rod Vagg) #5401 - (Robert Jefe Lindstaedt) #5531 - New option to select you VS Version in the Windows installer - (julien.waechter) #4645 - Support Visual C++ Build Tools 2015 - (João Reis) #5627 * tools: - Gyp now works on OSX without XCode - (Shigeki Ohtsu) #1325

This LTS release comes with 113 commits, 56 of which are doc related, 18 of which are build / tooling related, 16 of which are test related and 7 which are benchmark related. Notable Changes: * build: - Updated Logos for the OSX + Windows installers - (Rod Vagg) #5401 - (Robert Jefe Lindstaedt) #5531 - New option to select your VS Version in the Windows installer - (julien.waechter) #4645 - Support Visual C++ Build Tools 2015 - (João Reis) #5627 * tools: - Gyp now works on OSX without XCode - (Shigeki Ohtsu) #1325

This LTS release comes with 113 commits, 56 of which are doc related, 18 of which are build / tooling related, 16 of which are test related and 7 which are benchmark related. Notable Changes: * build: - Updated Logos for the OSX + Windows installers - (Rod Vagg) #5401 - (Robert Jefe Lindstaedt) #5531 - New option to select your VS Version in the Windows installer - (julien.waechter) #4645 - Support Visual C++ Build Tools 2015 - (João Reis) #5627 * tools: - Gyp now works on OSX without XCode - (Shigeki Ohtsu) #1325 PR-URL: #5835

This issue has already submitted to the upstream in https://code.google.com/p/gyp/issues/detail?id=477 Use this commit until the upstream is to be fixed. PR-URL: nodejs#1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

This is a port of eb459c8 , used as a floating patch over gyp. Original commit message: This issue has already submitted to the upstream in https://code.google.com/p/gyp/issues/detail?id=477 Use this commit until the upstream is to be fixed. PR-URL: nodejs/node#1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> This was ported to v0.10 in nodejs#25857 PR-URL: nodejs/node#2843 Reviewed-By: rvagg - Rod Vagg <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: orangemocha - Alexis Campailla <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: bnoordhuis - Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

This issue has already submitted to the upstream in https://code.google.com/p/gyp/issues/detail?id=477 Use this commit until the upstream is to be fixed. PR-URL: #1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

Most builds are possible with just the "Command Line Tools for XCode" nodejs has extensive experience with this scenario BUG=gyp:477 nodejs PR-URL: nodejs/node#1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

gibfahn · 2017-06-18T13:29:27Z

For some reason e7c3f4a97b is showing on branch-diff for 6.x, not sure why as be65f5f is in the v6.x branch already.

This issue has already submitted to the upstream in https://code.google.com/p/gyp/issues/detail?id=477 Use this commit until the upstream is to be fixed. PR-URL: nodejs#1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

This issue has already submitted to the upstream in https://code.google.com/p/gyp/issues/detail?id=477 Use this commit until the upstream is to be fixed. PR-URL: nodejs/node#1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

This issue has already submitted to the upstream in https://code.google.com/p/gyp/issues/detail?id=477 Use this commit until the upstream is to be fixed. PR-URL: #1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

Most builds are possible with just the "Command Line Tools for XCode" nodejs has extensive experience with this scenario BUG=gyp:477 nodejs PR-URL: nodejs/node#1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Change-Id: I89ce12a8c92db6172f2f13d168233504d6de57ab

Shigeki Ohtsu and others added 3 commits April 2, 2015 21:37

deps: update gyp to e1c8fcf7

80da54c

gyp: fix build with python 2.6

107a68b

fix nodejs#6859

tools: fix gyp to work on MacOSX without XCode

91f36d0

This issue has already submitted to the upstream in https://code.google.com/p/gyp/issues/detail?id=477 Use this commit until the upstream is to be fixed.

mscdex added the openssl Issues and PRs related to the OpenSSL dependency. label Apr 2, 2015

Shigeki Ohtsu added 3 commits April 3, 2015 11:24

deps: refactor openssl.gyp

ebc75f5

Updated gyp has "else if" syntax in condition. Use this for target_arch and OS switches. Several sources, defines, rules and libraries variables moved to gypi files.

benchmark: add/remove hash algorithm

12f72b5

add sha1, sha512 algorithm and remove md5

benchmark: add rsa/aes-gcm performance test

6b3c90c

shigeki force-pushed the refactor_opensslgyp branch from d7f9be8 to 6b3c90c Compare April 3, 2015 02:43

shigeki mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2015

Release proposal: v1.6.4 #1340

Closed

shigeki pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2015

deps: update gyp to e1c8fcf7

21f4fb6

PR-URL: #1325 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>

jasnell mentioned this pull request May 11, 2017

8.0.0 Release Proposal #12220

Closed

gibfahn mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2017

Auditing for 6.11.1 nodejs/Release#230

Closed

3 tasks

gibfahn added the dont-land-on-v6.x label Jun 18, 2017

MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Sep 10, 2017

v8.5.0 proposal #15308

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Upgrade to openssl-1.0.2a (Part1) #1325

Upgrade to openssl-1.0.2a (Part1) #1325

shigeki commented Apr 2, 2015

indutny commented Apr 2, 2015

bnoordhuis commented Apr 2, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 3, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 3, 2015

rvagg commented Apr 3, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 3, 2015

jbergstroem commented Apr 3, 2015

bnoordhuis commented Apr 3, 2015

rvagg commented Apr 3, 2015

rvagg commented Apr 3, 2015

bnoordhuis commented Apr 3, 2015

indutny commented Apr 3, 2015

rvagg commented Apr 3, 2015

Fishrock123 commented Apr 4, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 4, 2015

Fishrock123 commented Apr 4, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 4, 2015

gibfahn commented Jun 18, 2017

Upgrade to openssl-1.0.2a (Part1) #1325

Upgrade to openssl-1.0.2a (Part1) #1325

Conversation

shigeki commented Apr 2, 2015

indutny commented Apr 2, 2015

bnoordhuis commented Apr 2, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 3, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 3, 2015

rvagg commented Apr 3, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 3, 2015

jbergstroem commented Apr 3, 2015

bnoordhuis commented Apr 3, 2015

rvagg commented Apr 3, 2015

rvagg commented Apr 3, 2015

bnoordhuis commented Apr 3, 2015

indutny commented Apr 3, 2015

rvagg commented Apr 3, 2015

Fishrock123 commented Apr 4, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 4, 2015

Fishrock123 commented Apr 4, 2015

shigeki commented Apr 4, 2015

gibfahn commented Jun 18, 2017