Suggest jarvis for latest repository

[Zefau]

No description provided.

[GermanBluefox]

Automated adapter checker

ioBroker.jarvis

• ❗ [E145] No news found for actual version 1.0.0-rc.2
• ❗ [E300] Not found on travis. Please setup travis
• 👀 [W400] Cannot find "jarvis" in latest repository

Add comment "RE-CHECK!" to start check anew

[Zefau]

No news found for actual version 1.0.0-rc.2

1.0.0-rc.2 is only on Github, not npm. News for 1.0.0-rc.1 is available.

[E300] Not found on travis. Please setup travis

It is on pro, see https://travis-ci.com/Zefau/ioBroker.jarvis

[W400] Cannot find "jarvis" in latest repository

Trying with this issue 🥇

[Zefau]

@Apollon77

[Zefau]

Is it actually possible to check branches (https://github.com/Zefau/ioBroker.jarvis/tree/v1.0.x) with https://adapter-check.iobroker.in/ ?

[Apollon77]

No, adapter checker always check master

[Zefau]

Would you merge though?

No news found for actual version 1.0.0-rc.2

1.0.0-rc.2 is only on Github, not npm. News for 1.0.0-rc.1 is available.

[E300] Not found on travis. Please setup travis

It is on pro, see https://travis-ci.com/Zefau/ioBroker.jarvis

[W400] Cannot find "jarvis" in latest repository

Trying with this issue 🥇

[Apollon77]

@Zefau
Some comments (I checked the 1.0.x branch):

• if unit tests fail that way as they do then do not run them ... or fix them ;-)
• For now ok, but at least in the io-package we should have all languages translated that are standard! Please change that till stable - or we need to discuss again about this in the community; also having links only as version new is not that user friendly and shoukd be changed
• "installedFrom" needs to be removed from io-package!! Please fix that
• Note: https://github.com/Zefau/ioBroker.jarvis/blob/v1.0.x/lib/library.js#L302 ... "delete this._STATES[key]" is the official command ... I do not know if there is a difference to set to undefined ...

[Zefau]

Unit test runs successful, see https://travis-ci.com/github/Zefau/ioBroker.jarvis/branches

Where do you see it failing?

Translation will be done, even though I'm not a friend of Google translated texts.

Io package will be cleaned soon.

Is there something wrong with delete from your perspective? It is like setting it to undefined, but that is addressed in the code.

[Apollon77]

For delete vs undefined I really do not know. It should be the same effect, but „delete“ is the official way to delete a value. Maybe there are differences in the deeeeeeep insides ... that’s why it was just a note.

Tests do not fail but when you check travis log output from Master i saw unhandled promise rejection on unit tests.

[Zefau]

Didn't see that, thanks!

Zefau/ioBroker.jarvis#90
Zefau/ioBroker.jarvis#91
Zefau/ioBroker.jarvis#93