Fix Regression of ssd_resnet50_v1 Example for TF New API #1283
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: zehao-intel <[email protected]>
lvliang-intel
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2023
chensuyue
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2023
Signed-off-by: zehao-intel <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit d87cf86)
chensuyue
pushed a commit
to chensuyue/lpot
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type of Change
bug fix
Description
Three Conv2D Ops is changed from qint8 to quint8 after this commit: 7fb76c4.
Then, the accuracy dropped a lot.
This PR is to fallback them to fp32 so that the accuracy will be correct.
Maybe we should consider adding 'qint8' or quint8 for op_wise_config.
Expected Behavior & Potential Risk
Fix bug and accuracy.
How has this PR been tested?
Extension test.
Dependency Change?
No