Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 25, 2024. It is now read-only.

df: types: Seperate validation from Defintions #476

Open
johnandersen777 opened this issue Mar 14, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

df: types: Seperate validation from Defintions #476

johnandersen777 opened this issue Mar 14, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working kind/dataflow Issues partaining to DataFlows p4 Nice To Have tL Esitmated Time To Complete: Long
Milestone

Comments

@johnandersen777
Copy link

Definitions are supposed to be independent serializable structures. However, we've added the validation parameter which can be a function or an instance name.

The issues with this are

  1. validation functions can't be serialized, since they're functions
  2. operation instance names are tied to dataflows

As a side note: remove_unvalidated_inputs and remove_input should really be async functions. Also, they should be required method defined within the abstract base class.

@johnandersen777 johnandersen777 added bug Something isn't working kind/dataflow Issues partaining to DataFlows p0 Critical Priority tL Esitmated Time To Complete: Long labels Mar 14, 2020
@johnandersen777 johnandersen777 added this to the 0.3.8 Alpha Release milestone Apr 16, 2020
@johnandersen777 johnandersen777 added p4 Nice To Have and removed p0 Critical Priority labels Jul 29, 2020
johnandersen777 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 31, 2023
…dataflow policy engine: README: Add inital sketch

Related: w3c/vc-jose-cose#51
Related: #1400
Related: #1315
Related: #476
Related: #349
Related: #382
Signed-off-by: John Andersen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working kind/dataflow Issues partaining to DataFlows p4 Nice To Have tL Esitmated Time To Complete: Long
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant