Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmarking results #88

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2022
Merged

Conversation

mosonyi
Copy link
Collaborator

@mosonyi mosonyi commented Apr 5, 2022

@haerdib as per your request...

@haerdib haerdib requested review from brenzi and haerdib April 5, 2022 10:30
Copy link
Contributor

@haerdib haerdib left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I don't have any clue about these numbers. @brenzi does this seem sensible to you?

@haerdib haerdib merged commit 035050a into migration-preparation Apr 6, 2022
brenzi added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2022
* add a whole lot of pallets

* cargo fmt

* beauty changes only

* add some further solo chain infos

* add missing pallets

* cargo fmt

* add restrictive BaseFilter

* cargo fmt

* add better description

* fix build

* revert xcm pallet numbers

* increaes tx version

* remove FIXME - we should keep parachain weights here

* remove obsolete comment

* remove obsolete FIXME

* relax basefilter a little

* unbrick runtime upgrade

* unbrick runtime upgrade

* cargo fmt

* add new pallets to benchmark script

* fix migration naming

* Benchmarking results (#88)

* Bump polkadot 0.9.18 (#89)

* Bump tp polkadot 0.9.18 : compile

* Bump tp polkadot 0.9.18 : push forgotten cargo.lock

Co-authored-by: echevrier <[email protected]>

* hand-fixing remark weight

* bump 1.5.16

Co-authored-by: mosonyi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: echevrier <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: echevrier <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alain Brenzikofer <[email protected]>
@clangenb clangenb deleted the migration-benchmark branch December 20, 2022 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants