Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

expose aura storage in metadata #105

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2022
Merged

expose aura storage in metadata #105

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2022

Conversation

clangenb
Copy link
Contributor

@haerdib
Copy link
Contributor

haerdib commented Apr 26, 2022 •
edited
Loading

LGTM. Would this warrant its own release?

echevrier
echevrier approved these changes Apr 26, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@echevrier echevrier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@clangenb
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't think it needs a release if we don't suddenly strictly need it. I just noticed that when I was playing around for the process to add an authority to the autority set. As long as we don't do this in production, we don't really need that release.

@clangenb clangenb merged commit e7c06f7 into master Apr 26, 2022
@clangenb clangenb deleted the cl/add-aura-storage branch July 19, 2022 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@echevrier echevrier echevrier approved these changes

@brenzi brenzi Awaiting requested review from brenzi

@haerdib haerdib Awaiting requested review from haerdib

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Storage to aura's runtime config;
3 participants
@clangenb @haerdib @echevrier