Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: remove duplicate 'the' in staking query comments #304

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aztecEagle22
Copy link

Description

This PR fixes typos in the mstaking module's query.proto file by removing duplicate word "the" in the comments.

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • [N/A] reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

@aztecEagle22 aztecEagle22 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2024 18:15
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves modifications to the query.proto file in the initia.mstaking.v1 package. The changes consist solely of correcting comments within the message definitions for QueryValidatorResponse, QueryDelegatorValidatorsResponse, and QueryDelegatorValidatorResponse. These corrections address typographical errors, specifically removing redundant phrases. The structure, service methods, and overall functionality of the gRPC queries remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
proto/initia/mstaking/v1/query.proto Updated comments in QueryValidatorResponse, QueryDelegatorValidatorsResponse, and QueryDelegatorValidatorResponse to correct typographical errors.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: add tally result querier #266: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the gov.proto and query.proto files, which are in the same package as the query.proto file in the main PR. While the main PR focuses on comment corrections, the retrieved PR introduces new message structures and RPC methods that may relate to the overall functionality of the gRPC queries in the same context.

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where comments dwell,
A typo was fixed, and all is well.
The validators now shine, clear and bright,
With words that are right, oh what a sight!
Hopping with joy, we celebrate this feat,
Clarity in code makes our work complete! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 99721d0 and c49825e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • proto/initia/mstaking/v1/query.proto (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • proto/initia/mstaking/v1/query.proto

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant