Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Offline methods #1019

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jun 10, 2022
Merged

Offline methods #1019

merged 13 commits into from
Jun 10, 2022

Conversation

pelord
Copy link
Member

@pelord pelord commented Mar 25, 2022

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

What is the new behavior?
Adding methods to provide offline storage for data
ALL THE CREDIT of this dev should be attributed to @olivierSaintCyr

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")

  • Yes
  • No

If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

Other information:

@pelord pelord marked this pull request as ready for review May 19, 2022 15:13
@PhilippeLafreniere18
Copy link
Contributor

I hit on this when switch to context "Exemples de légendes" :
image

@pelord
Copy link
Member Author

pelord commented Jun 10, 2022

@PhilippeLafreniere18 this is fixed. This error is due to Arcgis layer, this datasource is based on a function url instead of a direct url to the data.

@PhilippeLafreniere18 PhilippeLafreniere18 merged commit dddfe7a into next Jun 10, 2022
@pelord pelord deleted the offlineMethods branch June 10, 2022 17:31
cbourget pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2023
* feat(core): add a compression service for blob

* feat(geo): adding service to store/retrieve data within indexed-db

* wip compression handling for non blob object

* wip

* feat(vector): method to retrieve data from online or offline source (indexeddb)

* wip - adjust vector layer custom loader

* wip

* chore(*): ngx-indexed-db version update

Co-authored-by: Pierre-Étienne Lord <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants