Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STS-470: Update conan version to 1.48.0 #296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

adamlb94
Copy link
Contributor

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented May 12, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Comment on lines -44 to +53
SRC="https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk16-binaries/releases/download/jdk-16.0.1%2B9/OpenJDK16U-jdk_x64_linux_hotspot_16.0.1_9.tar.gz"
SRC="https://github.com/adoptium/temurin16-binaries/releases/download/jdk-16.0.2%2B7/OpenJDK16U-jdk_x64_linux_hotspot_16.0.2_7.tar.gz"
fi

if "$darwin" = "true"; then
SRC="https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk16-binaries/releases/download/jdk-16.0.1%2B9/OpenJDK16U-jdk_x64_mac_hotspot_16.0.1_9.tar.gz"
SRC="https://github.com/adoptium/temurin16-binaries/releases/download/jdk-16.0.2%2B7/OpenJDK16U-jdk_x64_mac_hotspot_16.0.2_7.tar.gz"
export JAVA_HOME="$JAVA_HOME/Contents/Home"
fi

if "$windows" = "true"; then
SRC="https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk16-binaries/releases/download/jdk-16.0.1%2B9/OpenJDK16U-jdk_x64_windows_hotspot_16.0.1_9.zip"
SRC="https://github.com/adoptium/temurin16-binaries/releases/download/jdk-16.0.2%2B7/OpenJDK16U-jdk_x64_windows_hotspot_16.0.2_7.zip"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes seem to have been made automatically by a build script. The only manual change I made is in the build.gradle file

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's probably fine, I'm just wondering why it did that / why it was necessary.
@dsypniewski what do you think?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems fine to me. My best guess is that curiostack rebuilt their packages with newer minor versions of java when moving away from bintray.

@adamlb94 adamlb94 merged commit 9483437 into master May 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants