Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow service port name override #41

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

rubel-ahammad
Copy link
Contributor

@rubel-ahammad rubel-ahammad commented Sep 9, 2024

Fixes: #40

@rubel-ahammad rubel-ahammad force-pushed the allow-service-port-name-override branch from caac40c to 8f7657e Compare September 9, 2024 16:52
@jhillyerd jhillyerd linked an issue Sep 9, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@jhillyerd jhillyerd requested a review from cpanato September 9, 2024 22:37
Copy link
Collaborator

@cpanato cpanato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you please bump the chart version

@rubel-ahammad
Copy link
Contributor Author

can you please bump the chart version

I added an option in the chart. So I believe it is a feature change and the new version should be 2.4.0. @cpanato what do you think?

@rubel-ahammad rubel-ahammad force-pushed the allow-service-port-name-override branch from 24b462d to acf7828 Compare September 11, 2024 09:29
@cpanato
Copy link
Collaborator

cpanato commented Sep 12, 2024

can you please bump the chart version

I added an option in the chart. So I believe it is a feature change and the new version should be 2.4.0. @cpanato what do you think?

That is fine, the feature is not changing the actual behavior so we can consider a patch, but this is also fine

Thanks for doing this!

@cpanato
Copy link
Collaborator

cpanato commented Sep 12, 2024

Error: UPGRADE FAILED: template: inbucket/templates/service.yaml:29:22: executing "inbucket/templates/service.yaml" at <.Values.service.portName.http>: nil pointer evaluating interface {}.http

rubel-ahammad and others added 4 commits September 12, 2024 10:38
Signed-off-by: Rubel Ahammad <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rubel Ahammad <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rubel Ahammad <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rubel Ahammad <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rubel Ahammad <[email protected]>
@rubel-ahammad rubel-ahammad force-pushed the allow-service-port-name-override branch from f7a2069 to 076ab70 Compare September 12, 2024 04:38
@rubel-ahammad
Copy link
Contributor Author

rubel-ahammad commented Sep 12, 2024 via email

Copy link
Collaborator

@cpanato cpanato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@cpanato cpanato merged commit c7ee2c8 into inbucket:main Sep 13, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Need a way to customize Service ports when we use Istio
2 participants