-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unit tests for adapter, business-delegate, factory-method and command modules #294
Conversation
Here are my review remarks:
|
This is all for now. Please comment on this thread once you have made the changes and I will review again. |
I have made the suggested changes. I look forward to your review comments. |
Hi @mfarid I looked at it again. It is all great except that the code is still not formatted according to Google rules. Can you check once more? |
I have formatted all these files using the suggested code style. Please check again and let me know if it is good now or needs any changes. |
Unit tests for adapter, business-delegate, factory-method and command modules
Looks good, thank you! |
Thanks a lot for accepting this Pull Request. I appreciate your quick review and feedback. |
Thanks for your contribution @faridiflex |
This pull request contains unit tests for the following modules.
The existing tests were more of Exercise Tests which were just running the code and printing the output. This code was not asserting the expected behaviour. This Pull Request covers the code to 100% of lines of these 4 patterns. The code coverage report can be generated and viewed using the instructions mentioned in CODE_COVERAGE.md
Please let me know in case of any issues/concerns.
Mohd Farid
DevFactory - Open Source Unit Test Team
DevFactory is committed to improving code quality of open source. Our team contributes their time to researching and identifying areas for improving test coverage of open source projects.