Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 1884 (ethereum#2180)

Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing

EIPS/eip-1884.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ category: Core
 discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/opcode-repricing/3024
 status: Draft
 created: 2019-03-28
-requires: 150
+requires: 150, 1052
 ---
 
 
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ At block `N`,
 - The `SLOAD` (`0x54`) operation changes from `200` to `800` gas,
 - The `BALANCE` (`0x31`) operation changes from `400` to `700` gas,
 - The `EXTCODEHASH` (`0x3F`) operation changes from `400` to `700` gas,
-- A new opcode, `SELFBALANCE` is introduced at `0x46`. 
+- A new opcode, `SELFBALANCE` is introduced at `0x47`. 
   - `SELFBALANCE` pops `0` arguments off the stack, 
   - `SELFBALANCE` pushes the `balance` of the current address to the stack,
   - `SELFBALANCE` is priced as `GasFastStep`, at `5` gas. 
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ opcodes: `EXTBALANCE(address)` and `SELFBALANCE`, and have two different prices.
 
 ### `EXTCODEHASH`
 
-`EXTCODEHASH` was introduced in Constantinople, with [EIP 1052](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1052). It was priced at `400` with the reasoning:
+`EXTCODEHASH` was introduced in Constantinople, with [EIP-1052](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1052). It was priced at `400` with the reasoning:
 
 > The gas cost is the same as the gas cost for the `BALANCE` opcode because the execution of the `EXTCODEHASH` requires the same account lookup as in `BALANCE`.