Backport missing Oracle CPE from jdk17 #635
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The files are missing the Oracle "Classpath" exception in jdk11 but are otherwise identical to jdk17. Signed-off-by: Peter Shipton <[email protected]>
pshipton
added a commit
to pshipton/openj9-openjdk-jdk
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2023
The files are resolved by ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk11#635 Signed-off-by: Peter Shipton <[email protected]>
keithc-ca
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2023
|
No build needed to verify comment changes. |
pshipton
added a commit
to pshipton/openj9-openjdk-jdk
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2023
The files are resolved by ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk11#635 Signed-off-by: Peter Shipton <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The files are missing the Oracle "Classpath" exception in jdk11 but are otherwise identical to jdk17.
We will request OpenJDK to fix this for future releases.