EIP-4844 support

[NickSneo]

What does this PR do?

Adds support for EIP-4844

Where should the reviewer start?

Review all files

Why is it needed?

Closes #1979

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 28 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (36d778b) 68.65% compared to head (e199d7f) 68.94%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...web3j/crypto/transaction/type/Transaction4844.java	85.41%	12 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
crypto/src/main/java/org/web3j/crypto/Blob.java	30.76%	9 Missing ⚠️
...src/main/java/org/web3j/crypto/RawTransaction.java	66.66%	2 Missing ⚠️
...main/java/org/web3j/crypto/TransactionDecoder.java	96.49%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ypto/src/main/java/org/web3j/crypto/BlobUtils.java	92.85%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2000      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     68.65%   68.94%   +0.28%     
- Complexity     3040     3087      +47     
============================================
  Files           490      493       +3     
  Lines         12715    12911     +196     
  Branches       1653     1661       +8     
============================================
+ Hits           8730     8902     +172     
- Misses         3501     3522      +21     
- Partials        484      487       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[gtebrean]

Few comments, also add test cases for this.

[cfelde]

Added some minor comments/suggestions and questions.

I think test cases will confirm the question, specifically, the ability to submit a 4844 while just providing the blobs and have Web3j manage the proofs and related.

[cfelde]

Some questions for review/discussion

[gtebrean]

👍

[gtebrean]

let's move to 2.0.12, is the latest one