-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): upgrade angular in examples/supply chain app #2020
chore(deps): upgrade angular in examples/supply chain app #2020
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aldousalvarez LGTM, thank you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aldousalvarez Unfortunately a merge conflict came in through one of the commits that got merged to main since this was approved. Please fix the conflict and then we should be good to go again.
Don't forget to re-request review when done.
56e6206
to
e6055db
Compare
Hello @petermetz fixed the merge conflict that you said. And now all checks have passed. Thank you |
e6055db
to
2e1df2c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
7d40669
to
f4ce927
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @petermetz fixed the merge conflict that you said. And now all checks have passed. Thank you
@aldousalvarez Great, thanks. Please rebase onto upstream/main
and then run yarn
to make sure that the lock file is updated. Right now if you run yarn
it produces a diff on the lock file.
f4ce927
to
96db50e
Compare
@petermetz Already done. Thank you |
96db50e
to
81a097f
Compare
Depends on #2096 |
62ed9a2
to
3892c83
Compare
4de1601
to
425d913
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aldousalvarez Please fix the merge conflicts and then LGTM.
@aldousalvarez Please put the dependency declaration to the PR description next time. The bot doesn't scan the PR comments for it. |
3d378d1
to
77ff220
Compare
@petermetz Fixed the merge conflicts and now all checks have passed.
My apologies on this one. Should I put it on the commit message with the fixes and signed-off-by? |
@aldousalvarez It still shows that the conflicts are there => This branch has conflicts that must be resolved
to resolve conflicts before continuing.
Conflicting files
yarn.lock |
@aldousalvarez Yes, that works best. I usually have the Fixes line and then right below it the depends on line |
3e3198a
to
7136174
Compare
my apologies on that one, as of now all checks have passed and all conflicts have been resolved |
7136174
to
6c0c919
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aldousalvarez No worries, thanks for fixing it!
Other advice for the future (also not a big deal at all, just making sure you are aware) =>
when you make a change in response to a change request review (like the conflict resolution you just did) then you have to "pass the ball back" to the reviewer by re-requesting the review when you've addressed the change request.
6c0c919
to
0442327
Compare
Fixes hyperledger-cacti#2002 Signed-off-by: aldousalvarez <[email protected]>
0442327
to
7ca4bfd
Compare
Fixes #2002
Signed-off-by: aldousalvarez [email protected]