-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Logical (and) & (or) should accept any number of arguments #835
Comments
refi64
added a commit
to refi64/hy
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2015
refi64
added a commit
to refi64/hy
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2015
refi64
added a commit
to refi64/hy
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2015
This can be closed. Nullary |
And the Unary case too. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Again I am surprised. There's no good reason for a minimum of 2 arguments here. Hy already supports 0-, and 1-arg
+
, even though Python doesn't*.Why should Hy do this even though Python can't?
The same reasoning should apply to
and
andor
.*Python actually does have a unary
+
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: