Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flash-attn performance: remove cuda sync during inference #33570

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2024

Conversation

Cyrilvallez
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

#31629 & #32241 introduced a functionality in FA2 intended for training efficiency. However, it adds unnecessary cuda synchronization at inference time in every forward pass due to always checking (torch.diff(position_ids, dim=-1) >= 0).all() in the elif condition. This PR fixes the performance issue by simply switching the order of the different checks in the elif condition, to make good use of Python's default short-circuit evaluation. Indeed, at inference time, query_length will always be 1 except during prefill, thus we will short-circuit torch synchronization all the time.

Performance degradation was not so significant, but this PR allows to win back around 5-10% speed at inference time from the quick tests I ran.

@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

@Cyrilvallez
Copy link
Member Author

cc @ArthurZucker, forgot to ping you

Copy link
Collaborator

@ArthurZucker ArthurZucker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👀 nice hack, awesome that you found about it!

@Cyrilvallez Cyrilvallez merged commit 1f33023 into huggingface:main Oct 7, 2024
17 checks passed
NielsRogge pushed a commit to NielsRogge/transformers that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
…e#33570)

Switch conditions to use short-circuit during inference
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants