Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Upcasting for FSDP in Mixed Precision. Add Concept Guide for FSPD and DeepSpeed. #2674
Add Upcasting for FSDP in Mixed Precision. Add Concept Guide for FSPD and DeepSpeed. #2674
Changes from all commits
3c3cf2e
35af870
c67249f
fd81eb1
c650673
2bf8b9c
d68c5d3
c9794e7
af71e9f
0b8e97c
681c697
3b74c26
c366b78
59ed2c1
92125b8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
's
buts
in#torch-tensor)'s.
above[torch.Optimizer](https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/optim.html#module-torch.optim)’s
dtype's
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
probably would be more clear as:
it's ambiguous when it's passed as a positional argument, since I don't think it is even supported.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fabianlim, it looks like this introduced a breakage in FSDP integration - one of our tests now fails because of the last 2 lines, but works fine prior to this PR being merged.
the total size (numel) is correct, but the shape is wrong
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also cc: @muellerzr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the training step was just a trivial tiny llama2 model, like: https://huggingface.co/stas/tiny-random-llama-2
and the config was:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@stas00 can you share the accelerate config ? This looks like something commonly seen if NOSHaRD is used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
full config:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok I think it’s because of use-orig-params being set to true. This was a setting that I didn’t test
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason to do the upcasting so late in the game? Won't it be much simpler to do it before the model gets wrapped by FSDP?
Accelerate knows by this time everything it needs to know to make the right thing, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason is because we only wanted to cast the sharded params and not the whole model. Casting the whole model is not a good idea. DeepSpeed does the same thing and only casts the sharded params
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't we say that this was a convenience workaround and that the model should have been loaded in fp32 in the first place for fsdp to converge well?
Frankly, when do you not shard most of the model parameters? and even if selective typically it's the big params that are sharded so 2x of that would be close to all of model's params doubled in size.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@stas00
Essentially what I am saying is that upcasting ahead is will in general incur a 2X overhead in CPU memory in most general usage patterns that overhead will be there regardless if we use low_cpu_mem mode or not
BTW im having a bit of trouble reproducing your error on torch 2.1.2 and 2.2.0.
learning_rate_repro.py
script in the main issuedataset.json
is prepared following thisaccelerate_stas.yaml
is the config that was shared above.stas/tiny-random-llama-2
and the training runs.