This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 31, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if I don't miss anything, the struct
s
and methodjson.Unmarshal
are the same. why to call it twice here when error occurring, or what issue are you going to fix?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The context is that Huawei Cloud API response for create backup policy has
max_backups
,retention_duration_days
,permanent
as string type but get and list api response has them as int and bool. Also other clouds like OTC, Telefonica, Orange have return type as string for mentioned parameters. First unmarshal call tries to unmarshal for string type but if it fails, then we check for UnmarshalTypeError (which occurs if type conversion is not possible) and the we try to unmarshal again in a struct which has them as int and bool.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@freesky-edward this solution is similar to #85
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Savasw ok, it's ok to me as a temporary solution. thanks for your update