Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alternative VPN providers #32

Closed
itisNathaniel opened this issue Aug 23, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Alternative VPN providers #32

itisNathaniel opened this issue Aug 23, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@itisNathaniel
Copy link

Can this Docker container be used with other VPN providers such as FrootVPN?

@haugene
Copy link
Owner

haugene commented Aug 23, 2015

Yes, it can be extended to support any OpenVPN provider.

How familiar are you with Docker? If you have a look at the code, and check out pull request #28 in particular you might figure out how to extend it and I would happily accept a pull request adding Froot as a provider.

If not, I could extend it for you. I don't have an account there, but you could verify when it works. I have a busy week so I won't rush it, but maybe next weekend?

@itisNathaniel
Copy link
Author

That's awesome thank you!
Will have a go trying to extend it myself but if I struggle I'll let you know.
Cheers.
How easy would it be to run another app within the same instance? (Such as something like Sonarr kr

@itisNathaniel
Copy link
Author

*or another application to transmit soley over the VPN?).
P.S: sorry about the two posts, I clumsily submitted the first one before I'd finished!

@haugene
Copy link
Owner

haugene commented Aug 31, 2015

Hello again.

I have now added FrootVPN as a provider. It should be OK but I need you to verify that it's working, as I don't have an account with Froot. Follow instructions from the readme, but use the dev-tag as it's only available there (image: haugene/transmission-openvpn:dev).

Second... Yes it is possible to run another app inside the same container, but it is generally not recommended. I get that it can tempting to squeeze it in there, and you could... But it would be cleaner to create a separate container for this.

@haugene
Copy link
Owner

haugene commented Sep 7, 2015

Merged to master, closing issue.

@haugene haugene closed this as completed Sep 7, 2015
@itisNathaniel
Copy link
Author

Sorry, I meant to reply earlier!
It worked fantastically thank you and I have implemented it in addition to my other software in different containers.
Cheers for your help!

@haugene
Copy link
Owner

haugene commented Sep 7, 2015

Glad to hear it works. Np :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants