support GHC 9.10 #220
Draft
support GHC 9.10 #220
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
frasertweedale
force-pushed
the
ci/ghc-9.10
branch
from
80fedea
to
8ff1ded
Compare
6 tasks
frasertweedale
force-pushed
the
ci/ghc-9.10
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9f82edd
to
4b3bb49
Compare
frasertweedale
force-pushed
the
ci/ghc-9.10
branch
from
4b3bb49
to
45eb78e
Compare
1 task
blackheaven
reviewed
Jul 18, 2024
blackheaven
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
9.10 build fails due to bounds on
feedlibrary not admittingbase-4.20.0.0(upstream issue: haskell-party/feed#73 )Apart from that, this PR should fix the CI issues.
edit converting to draft until all deps support GHC 9.10.
In the meantime, I created #221 which deals with the CI failures arising due to libc version conflicts with the platform image (and only that issue).