Update supported tools list

[benz0li]

Please add

• GHC version 9.8.1
• Cabal version 3.10.2.0
• Stack version 2.13.1

to https://www.haskell.org/ghcup/install/#supported-tools and update tags latest and recommended.

[chreekat]

Hi @benz0li ,

Making new versions available is the responsibility of the projects themselves.

Having said that, I believe all 3 versions you want are already available. Are you not able to select them?

Note that the "recommended" tag, on the other hand, is decided by GHCup (and @hasufell in particular), and it is project policy to be rather conservative about updating it.

[benz0li]

Making new versions available is the responsibility of the projects themselves.

Ping @mpilgrem regarding Stack. Ping @Kleidukos regarding Cabal.

[chreekat]

@benz0li are you not able to select the versions you want?

Cabal 3.10.2.0 was added yesterday, haskell/ghcup-metadata@173d03e

GHC 9.8.1 was added a month ago, haskell/ghcup-metadata@dd4f6ff

Stack 2.13.1 was added on Sep 30, haskell/ghcup-metadata@397fd41

[benz0li]

@benz0li are you not able to select the versions you want?

Everything is fine.

Note that the "recommended" tag, on the other hand, is decided by GHCup (and @hasufell in particular), and it is project policy to be rather conservative about updating it.

I fully trust @hasufell's judgement.

[hasufell]

I think what is meant here is the website: https://www.haskell.org/ghcup/install/#supported-tools

[chreekat]

Ohhh... oops! Sorry for misunderstanding!

[benz0li]

Regarding the release of Cabal 3.10.2.0 see https://discourse.haskell.org/t/cabal-install-3-10-2-0-released/8009/3

[benz0li]

Ohhh... oops! Sorry for misunderstanding!

My fault. Should have expressed myself more clearly.

(Done. Updated comment.)

[hasufell]

Done

[benz0li]

@hasufell If you recommend GHC version 9.4.7, shouldn't you recommend cabal-install 3.8.1.0?

[hasufell]

@hasufell If you recommend GHC version 9.4.7, shouldn't you recommend cabal-install 3.8.1.0?

We want to recommend cabal 3.10.X, but it has deficiencies. The recommendation being a little subpar at the moment is a reflection of the tooling landscape. The other alternative would have been to not recommend 9.4.7, which seems like maybe that would have been better, since it's largely defunct on windows whenever C header files are involved: vmchale/libarchive#34