Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GHC 9.6 #109

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 17, 2023
Merged

Add GHC 9.6 #109

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 17, 2023

Conversation

develop7
Copy link
Collaborator

@develop7 develop7 commented Aug 2, 2023

Introduces GHC 9.6

@AlistairB
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, does ghc 9.6 require cabal 3.10? Cabal 3.10 was blocked on haskell/cabal#8849 . Also don't suppose you would interested in being added as maintainer of these images? 🙃 We have no particularly active maintainers atm and I am stepping away from the project (no pressure).

@develop7
Copy link
Collaborator Author

does ghc 9.6 require cabal 3.10?

It does print a warning, yes, but otherwise it gets built successfully (haven't run the test suite though; should do them probably)

@develop7
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also don't suppose you would interested in being added as maintainer of these images? 🙃 We have no particularly active maintainers atm and I am stepping away from the project (no pressure).

Not at all, go for it.

@AlistairB
Copy link
Contributor

AlistairB commented Aug 15, 2023

Cool, I have added your as a maintainer. My personal inclination would be to wait for cabal 3.10.2.0 which will hopefully fix the aarch64 release issue (which might be worth confirming). However, it might be fine to use 3.8 despite the warning. Feel free to merge and do a release. I can approve the official images PR.

@develop7 develop7 merged commit d33bf51 into haskell:master Aug 17, 2023
@develop7 develop7 deleted the feature-ghc9.6 branch August 17, 2023 11:44
@develop7
Copy link
Collaborator Author

squash-merged and released (docker-library/official-images#15222)

However, it might be fine to use 3.8 despite the warning.

I was thinking to keep 3.8 in aarch64 only, but then decided not to, for the sake of consistency

@tarleb
Copy link
Collaborator

tarleb commented Sep 28, 2023

We have no particularly active maintainers

I'm very sorry for disappearing. I'm back now and trying to pick things up again. Very happy to see we're growing 👋

@AlistairB
Copy link
Contributor

No worries! Yes lots of good activity!

@develop7 develop7 mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants