Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conform BSD-2-Clause and BSD-3-Clause text to SPDX (backport #9813) #9874

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Apr 9, 2024

cabal init text for BSD-2-Clause and BSD-3-Clause licence differed slightly from the one published at SPDX. [1] [2]

This caused some problems to users when dealing with licence-recognition software. [3]

[1] https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html
[2] https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause.html
[3] https://discourse.haskell.org/t/non-standard-license-generated-by-stack-new/9059


Include the following checklist in your PR:

  • Patches conform to the coding conventions.
  • Any changes that could be relevant to users have been recorded in the changelog.
  • The documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Manual QA notes have been included.
  • Tests have been added. (Ask for help if you don’t know how to write them! Ask for an exemption if tests are too complex for too little coverage!) automated tests not needed

QA Notes

  1. cabal init and a series of ⏎ (it should select a BSD licence)
  2. LICENSE file does not contain the sentence “All rights reserved.”.
    This is an automatic backport of pull request Conform BSD-2-Clause and BSD-3-Clause text to SPDX #9813 done by Mergify.

`cabal init` text for BSD-2-Clause and BSD-3-Clause licence differed
slightly from the one published at SPDX. [1] [2]

This caused some problems to users when dealing with licence-recognition
software. [3]

[1] https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html
[2] https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause.html
[3] https://discourse.haskell.org/t/non-standard-license-generated-by-stack-new/9059

(cherry picked from commit 1e86730)
@ffaf1 ffaf1 added attention: needs-review merge me Tell Mergify Bot to merge and removed attention: needs-review labels Apr 9, 2024
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 0a16cf7 into 3.12 Apr 9, 2024
54 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/3.12/pr-9813 branch April 9, 2024 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport merge me Tell Mergify Bot to merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants