Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add entry for 3.0 to init script #6240

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

emilypi
Copy link
Member

@emilypi emilypi commented Sep 13, 2019

The prompt for 3.0 requires some feedback. Otherwise, this addresses #6239


Please include the following checklist in your PR:

  • Patches conform to the coding conventions.
  • Any changes that could be relevant to users have been recorded in the changelog.
  • The documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • If the change is docs-only, [ci skip] is used to avoid triggering the build bots.

Please also shortly describe how you tested your change. Bonus points for added tests!

@fgaz
Copy link
Member

fgaz commented Sep 16, 2019

There's also the multiple public libraries / public sublibraries / public named libraries feature

@emilypi
Copy link
Member Author

emilypi commented Jan 1, 2020

@fgaz I discussed the feature list with @hvr, and we came to what was written as the conclusion. There are too many things to list in the prompt to make it reasonably informative between 2.4 -> 3.0, so some features are not going to be mentioned.

@m-renaud
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @emilypi, thanks for the PR, and sorry for the slow turn around on this. It appears this was done as part of a general cabal init cleanup in 2fa8302 so I'm going to close this out.

@m-renaud m-renaud closed this Apr 13, 2020
@emilypi
Copy link
Member Author

emilypi commented Apr 13, 2020

No worries @m-renaud thanks

@emilypi emilypi deleted the topos/interactive-3.0-option branch April 13, 2020 23:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants