Update npm package check-dependency-version-consistency to v3.3.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
check-dependency-version-consistency	devDependencies	minor	3.0.3 -> 3.3.0

---

Release Notes

bmish/check-dependency-version-consistency (check-dependency-version-consistency)

v3.3.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​605 Add new option --dep-type (@​bmish)
• #​606 Add optionalDependencies option to --dep-type (@​bmish)
• #​601 Add peerDependencies option to --dep-type (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.2.1

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​597 Fix publishing issue from v3.2.0 (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.2.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​591 Add Node API (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​596 Add some additional npm info to package.json (@​bmish)
• #​594 Harden CI (@​bmish)
• #​595 Test on Node 20 (@​bmish)
• #​593 Enable better TypeScript linting (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.1.1

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​590 pnpm workspace root package should not require name (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.1.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​574 Support pnpm workspaces (@​bmish)

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​586 Add back error messages when unable to detect workspaces (@​bmish)

📝 Documentation

• #​543 Mention competing offering Yarn Constraints in readme (@​bmish)
• #​544 Mention npm workspaces in readme (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​561 Add Node v19 to CI (@​ddzz)
• #​548 Add CodeQL (@​bmish)

Committers: 2

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)
• Darius Dzien (@​ddzz)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.23%. Comparing base (6f0b048) to head (68f3d3a).
Report is 40 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5101   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   20.23%   20.23%           
=======================================
  Files         508      508           
  Lines       17260    17260           
  Branches     2537     2537           
=======================================
  Hits         3492     3492           
  Misses      13730    13730           
  Partials       38       38           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.19% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	48.46% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.06% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.32% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	5.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	73.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-34.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.298 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.05 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.960 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.222 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.39 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.80 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.11 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$58.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 395 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.297 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$67.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$43.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.341 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$49.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$99.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 660 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 646 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.322 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$81.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$94.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 516 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.786 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$88.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 479 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.791 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$274 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.13 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$50.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$73.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[vilkinsons]

Closed in favor of #5045

[hash-worker]

Renovate Ignore Notification

Because you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update (3.3.0). You will get a PR once a newer version is released. To ignore this dependency forever, add it to the ignoreDeps array of your Renovate config.

If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR.