Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of Use our fork of bbolt to improve freelist performance into release/1.14.x #24214

Conversation

hc-github-team-secure-vault-core
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport

This PR is auto-generated from #24010 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label backport/1.14.x.

🚨

Warning automatic cherry-pick of commits failed. If the first commit failed,
you will see a blank no-op commit below. If at least one commit succeeded, you
will see the cherry-picked commits up to, not including, the commit where
the merge conflict occurred.

The person who merged in the original PR is:
@ncabatoff
This person should manually cherry-pick the original PR into a new backport PR,
and close this one when the manual backport PR is merged in.

merge conflict error: POST https://api.github.com/repos/hashicorp/vault/merges: 409 Merge conflict []

The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.


We want to adopt etcd-io/bbolt#585 before it appears in an official bbolt release.

Note that we're not modifying raft-boltdb yet, so raft.db (the bbolt file containing the raft log) doesn't benefit.


Overview of commits

@hc-github-team-secure-vault-core hc-github-team-secure-vault-core force-pushed the backport/use-forked-bbolt-faster-freelist/likely-safe-chigger branch from 53fc7dc to 39b7342 Compare November 21, 2023 15:08
@hc-github-team-secure-vault-core hc-github-team-secure-vault-core force-pushed the backport/use-forked-bbolt-faster-freelist/likely-safe-chigger branch from 39b7342 to 53fc7dc Compare November 21, 2023 15:08
@hashicorp-cla
Copy link

CLA assistant check

Thank you for your submission! We require that all contributors sign our Contributor License Agreement ("CLA") before we can accept the contribution. Read and sign the agreement

Learn more about why HashiCorp requires a CLA and what the CLA includes


temp seems not to be a GitHub user.
You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you already have a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.

Have you signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Recheck it.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed label Nov 21, 2023
Copy link

CI Results:
All Go tests succeeded! ✅

@ncabatoff
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing in favour of #24902

@ncabatoff ncabatoff closed this Jan 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants