-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chroot Listener #22304
Merged
Merged
Chroot Listener #22304
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3941454
Initial oss-patch apply
divyaac 89c0888
Added changelog
divyaac a01f0f0
Renamed changelog txt
divyaac 0b99ec3
Added the imports to the handler file
divyaac 2385bb1
Added a check that no two ports are the same, and modified changelog
divyaac 5d350e1
Edited go sum entry
divyaac d15dc2b
Tidy up using go mod
divyaac 4f0a36d
Use strutil instead
divyaac 5731feb
Merge branch 'main' into VAULT-17811_ChRoot_Listener
divyaac 1544f6a
Revert go sum and go mod
divyaac f8702f0
Revert sdk go sum
divyaac 6ef8d89
Edited go.sum to before
divyaac dc954e7
Edited go.sum again to initial
divyaac bad215f
Revert changes
divyaac d7c55b9
Merge branch 'main' into VAULT-17811_ChRoot_Listener
divyaac File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ | ||
```release-note:improvement | ||
core: add a listener configuration "chroot_namespace" that will be used as new root directory | ||
core: add a listener configuration "chroot_namespace" that forces requests to use a namespace hierarchy | ||
``` |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't object to this approach, but note that the way we'd usually do it is strutil.StrListContains. That has the minor benefit of avoiding the need for an extra variable.