Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OIDC provider for IBM ISAM #222

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 6, 2023

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Feb 17, 2023

Overview

This adds a custom provider to support IBM ISAM style group claims, which are basically a space separated string of group names. It is nearly identical to the SecureAuth provider, so refactoring common code might sense.

Design of Change

Creating a custom provider was enough to get the connection to our instance of IBM ISAM working.

Related Issues/Pull Requests

Contributor Checklist

[x] Add relevant docs to upstream Vault repository, or sufficient reasoning why docs won’t be added yet
IBM ISAM Provider Docs PR
[?] Add output for any tests not ran in CI to the PR description (eg, acceptance tests)
[x] Backwards compatible

@hashicorp-cla
Copy link

hashicorp-cla commented Feb 17, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@austingebauer austingebauer self-requested a review February 17, 2023 16:54
@austingebauer
Copy link
Contributor

@godvoigt - Are you able to sign the CLA?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Feb 24, 2023

@austingebauer Yes I signed it, but the status here is somehow not updated. If I click on "Recheck it", I am only redirected to my Github profile.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Feb 27, 2023

@austingebauer The CLA is fine now :-)

Copy link
Contributor

@austingebauer austingebauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @godvoigt!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants