Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve authorization error #137

Merged

Conversation

ramonberrutti
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

When using a custom allowed_redirect_uris for specific roles
we don't show a relationship between the role and the
redirect_uri when an authorization error occurred,
frustrating the user thinking that the problem is in
the role and not in the allowed_redirect_uris flag.

This error is common occurred with the CLI when the administrator doesn't add an allowed localhost path.

When using a custom allowed_redirect_uris for specific roles
we don't show a relationship between the role and the
redirect_uri when an authorization error occurred,
frustrating the user thinking that the problem is in
the role and not in the allowed_redirect_uris flag.
@hashicorp-cla
Copy link

hashicorp-cla commented Oct 6, 2020

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link
Contributor

@kalafut kalafut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM and is a good idea. Thanks!

@kalafut kalafut merged commit 6f4ec0d into hashicorp:master Oct 28, 2020
tvoran pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2020
When using a custom allowed_redirect_uris for specific roles
we don't show a relationship between the role and the
redirect_uri when an authorization error occurred,
frustrating the user thinking that the problem is in
the role and not in the allowed_redirect_uris flag.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants