-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Corrected example Scaleway code, cleared up token confusion #12177
Conversation
The adjustment was made after I spent a few minutes scratching my head, I have done the following: * Updated the 'provider' block in the first example code to be 'token' instead of 'access_key' - Didn't work previously. * Clarified locations of both 'access_key' and 'token' within the Scaleway panel, and appropriate naming. * Removed "empty" section in example block at the bottom, as this fails with an error when attempted. Overall I think this increases readability. I have tested this against my own Scaleway account.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
thanks for taking the time to improve the docs. Especially in this fundamental area.
The adjustment was made after I spent a few minutes scratching my head, I have done the following: * Updated the 'provider' block in the first example code to be 'token' instead of 'access_key' - Didn't work previously. * Clarified locations of both 'access_key' and 'token' within the Scaleway panel, and appropriate naming. * Removed "empty" section in example block at the bottom, as this fails with an error when attempted. Overall I think this increases readability. I have tested this against my own Scaleway account.
The adjustment was made after I spent a few minutes scratching my head, I have done the following: * Updated the 'provider' block in the first example code to be 'token' instead of 'access_key' - Didn't work previously. * Clarified locations of both 'access_key' and 'token' within the Scaleway panel, and appropriate naming. * Removed "empty" section in example block at the bottom, as this fails with an error when attempted. Overall I think this increases readability. I have tested this against my own Scaleway account.
* master: (499 commits) provider/aws: Fix the panic in ssm_association with parameters (#12215) Setting incident_urgency_rule as optional (#12211) Latest Section (#12151) provider/pagerduty: Import support for service integrations (#12141) command: fix test for new Meta type terraform: InstanceState.Meta is value type interface{} Update CHANGELOG.md flatmap: mark computed list as a computed value in Expand provider/azurerm: Bump AzureRM SDK to v8.0.1-beta (#11866) provider/profitbricks: fmt changes post cherry-pick provider/aws: Add missing SSM Links to documentation nav bar (#12202) update azure_network_interface documentation to say required for ip_configuration (#12185) Profitbricks primary nic fix (#12197) Update CHANGELOG.md Update CHANGELOG.md Update CHANGELOG.md Update CHANGELOG.md provider/aws: Lambda DeadLetterConfig support what was the value of the cluster id which caused the problem Corrected example code, cleared up token confusion (#12177) ...
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
The adjustment was made after I spent a few minutes scratching my head, I have done the following:
Overall I think this increases readability. I have tested this against my own Scaleway account.
Tested against terraform version 0.8.7