Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

r/virtual_machine: Ignore guest_id with content library #1014

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2020

Conversation

bill-rich
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bill-rich bill-rich requested a review from a team March 31, 2020 21:11
@ghost ghost added the size/xs Relative Sizing: Extra-Small label Mar 31, 2020
@bill-rich bill-rich merged commit ba4c301 into master Mar 31, 2020
@bill-rich bill-rich deleted the b-ignore_guest_id_for_cl branch March 31, 2020 23:23
@bill-rich bill-rich restored the b-ignore_guest_id_for_cl branch April 1, 2020 18:29
@aareet aareet deleted the b-ignore_guest_id_for_cl branch April 2, 2020 16:42
@@ -1261,6 +1261,9 @@ func resourceVSphereVirtualMachineCreateClone(d *schema.ResourceData, meta inter
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// There is not currently a way to pull config values from Content Library items. If we do not send the values,
// the defaults from the template will be used.
d.Set("guest_id", "")
Copy link

@Satak Satak Apr 9, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we have an IF statement before nulling this value? If user has passed guest_id it should null that out. Now this prevents any kind of customization to the VM.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 1, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 1, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
size/xs Relative Sizing: Extra-Small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants