-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify documentation around service_account_id expected value for google_service_account_iam_* resources #2180
Clarify documentation around service_account_id expected value for google_service_account_iam_* resources #2180
Comments
BTW, the code above doesn't even work. Most probably because either the docs are lying, the code is broken or both. The above produces the following:
The provider version is the latest, 1.18.0 |
I ended up using |
@walterdolce your example would not work, and in your case |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
The documentation says:
And that is all fine. But when it comes to having something like the following:
This would fail because:
As you can see I naturally went for using
account_id
. Little did I know I had to just useid
.This took me a bit of time away just to understand what I was doing wrong. It shouldn't happen.
Do you think the documentation would clearly state that the
id
, rather thanaccount_id
orunique_id
is expected to be set inservice_account_id
?I'm happy to send a PR for this so that this gets off your shoulders.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: