Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for disk config on the GKE Node Auto provisioning #4786

Conversation

modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

In this PR, I've added the feature to pass the disk_size and disk_type on the GKE node auto provisioning defaults to specify and change the default values on the provisioned nodes by NAP.

Related Configurations on the Google API: Link
Related issue: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#12722

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Generated Terraform, and ran make test and make lint to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

container: Added support for the Disk type and size configuration on the GKE Node Auto-provisioning

Derived from GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules#6649

@modular-magician modular-magician merged commit 9184ee5 into hashicorp:main Oct 13, 2022
@modular-magician modular-magician deleted the downstream-pr-52783b9796ea41c171d62df164ba7c7a82bea0c6 branch November 16, 2024 02:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant