-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AKS: add support for ingress-appgw addon #9419
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@tombuildsstuff do you have an ETA to having this merged in and released? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @derkoe - thanks for the pr, however it appears to be missing a test for the new block and updates to the docs. Could we get those added?
@@ -84,6 +87,39 @@ func schemaKubernetesAddOnProfiles() *schema.Schema { | |||
}, | |||
}, | |||
|
|||
"ingress_appgw": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could we not abbreviate this?
"ingress_appgw": { | |
"ingress_app_gateway": { |
Type: schema.TypeBool, | ||
Required: true, | ||
}, | ||
"appgw_id": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"appgw_id": { | |
"gateway_id": { |
Optional: true, | ||
ValidateFunc: azureHelpers.ValidateResourceID, | ||
}, | ||
"appgw_name": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it possible to pull this out of the gateway id?
Type: schema.TypeString, | ||
Optional: true, | ||
}, | ||
"appgw_subnet_id": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
given the block name containers app gateway could we
"appgw_subnet_id": { | |
"subnet_id": { |
also is this something we could load from the gateway? or does it potentially have multiple?
Optional: true, | ||
ValidateFunc: azureHelpers.ValidateResourceID, | ||
}, | ||
"appgw_subnet_prefix": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"appgw_subnet_prefix": { | |
"subnet_prefix": { |
also is this something we could load from the gateway? or does it potentially have multiple?
@derkoe Any chance this is still being worked on? I also have the same need and it looks like you're off to a great start to getting this going. I haven't been a contributor on this project yet, but I'm willing to try if there's anything I can do to help. |
@cwiederspan I'm sorry but we are not using Application Gateway anymore so my focus is not on this PR anymore. Maybe you can take over? |
This feature has been picked up by #11376. Probably people here can also subscribe that PR, which contains more comprehensive test and document. |
Hi Everyone, I didn't realize the following pull request existed before starting this one: #9419 However, it looks like that pull request is no longer in development. I tried to address the comments in that pull request in this pull request. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Mark
Hi Everyone, I didn't realize the following pull request existed before starting this one: hashicorp#9419 However, it looks like that pull request is no longer in development. I tried to address the comments in that pull request in this pull request. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Mark
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Closes #7384