Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AKS: add support for ingress-appgw addon #9419

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

AKS: add support for ingress-appgw addon #9419

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

derkoe
Copy link
Contributor

@derkoe derkoe commented Nov 23, 2020

Closes #7384

@Buthrakaur

This comment has been minimized.

@justin-vanwinkle

This comment has been minimized.

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff self-assigned this Feb 17, 2021
@picardsrcd
Copy link

@tombuildsstuff do you have an ETA to having this merged in and released?
From a workaround perspective, ill look at enabling the addon using CLI in the interim.

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @derkoe - thanks for the pr, however it appears to be missing a test for the new block and updates to the docs. Could we get those added?

@@ -84,6 +87,39 @@ func schemaKubernetesAddOnProfiles() *schema.Schema {
},
},

"ingress_appgw": {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could we not abbreviate this?

Suggested change
"ingress_appgw": {
"ingress_app_gateway": {

Type: schema.TypeBool,
Required: true,
},
"appgw_id": {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"appgw_id": {
"gateway_id": {

Optional: true,
ValidateFunc: azureHelpers.ValidateResourceID,
},
"appgw_name": {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it possible to pull this out of the gateway id?

Type: schema.TypeString,
Optional: true,
},
"appgw_subnet_id": {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

given the block name containers app gateway could we

Suggested change
"appgw_subnet_id": {
"subnet_id": {

also is this something we could load from the gateway? or does it potentially have multiple?

Optional: true,
ValidateFunc: azureHelpers.ValidateResourceID,
},
"appgw_subnet_prefix": {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"appgw_subnet_prefix": {
"subnet_prefix": {

also is this something we could load from the gateway? or does it potentially have multiple?

@cwiederspan
Copy link

@derkoe Any chance this is still being worked on? I also have the same need and it looks like you're off to a great start to getting this going. I haven't been a contributor on this project yet, but I'm willing to try if there's anything I can do to help.

@derkoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

derkoe commented Apr 15, 2021

@cwiederspan I'm sorry but we are not using Application Gateway anymore so my focus is not on this PR anymore. Maybe you can take over?

@magodo
Copy link
Collaborator

magodo commented Apr 20, 2021

This feature has been picked up by #11376. Probably people here can also subscribe that PR, which contains more comprehensive test and document.

@katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

katbyte commented Apr 27, 2021

I'm going to close this in favour of #11376 as @derkoe is no longer working on this

@katbyte katbyte closed this Apr 27, 2021
katbyte pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2021
Hi Everyone,

I didn't realize the following pull request existed before starting this one:

#9419

However, it looks like that pull request is no longer in development. I tried to address the comments in that pull request in this pull request.

Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Mark
alvintang pushed a commit to alvintang/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2021
Hi Everyone,

I didn't realize the following pull request existed before starting this one:

hashicorp#9419

However, it looks like that pull request is no longer in development. I tried to address the comments in that pull request in this pull request.

Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Mark
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 28, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for ingress-appgw add-on in azurerm_kubernetes_cluster
8 participants