Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Resource:
azurerm_app_service_certificate
#4192New Resource:
azurerm_app_service_certificate
#4192Changes from 1 commit
eac99e8
2372b75
1c0574f
aa330fe
703cc4a
8cf7c99
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thinking about this - would it be worth inferring the Key Vault ID from the Key Vault Secret ID so users didn't need to specify both fields?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would be very nice. However the Key Vault Secret ID is in format
{vaultBaseUrl}/certificates/{certificateName}/{certificateVersion}
so on top of the head not completely sure how to best manage this. Will investigate this during weekend.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good point - FWIW we look this up for the Key Vault child resources (e.g. certificates, keys, secrets) - so it should be possible to reuse the same technique (which calls into this method) :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks 🤯 Have made an attempt to reuse this.