-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add gateway_bypass property #3112
add gateway_bypass property #3112
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR @Lucretius,
Is there a reason we are not reading the value back in on read 🤔
Aside from that could we add this property to a test for verification?
Looks like I was following along with what was done for the other expressroute property - I can add them both to the read func. I will also add it to a test. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding the test, aside from the test resources being named test_1
this LGTM 👍
Tests are failing with:
resource 'azurerm_express_route_circuit.test' config: unknown resource 'azurerm_resource_group.test' referenced in variable azurerm_resource_group.test.name
- resource 'azurerm_express_route_circuit.test' config: unknown resource 'azurerm_resource_group.test' referenced in variable azurerm_resource_group.test.location
azurerm/resource_arm_virtual_network_gateway_connection_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azurerm/resource_arm_virtual_network_gateway_connection_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Gah, sorry you've had to act as my debugger on this. I do my acceptance testing with a personal subscription of Azure so some of these resources I am hesitant to run when I don't quite understand all of the resource billing :) |
@Lucretius no worries - I've kicked off the tests again so we'll find out shortly 👍 |
Test ended with the error:
|
I’ll go back to the drawing board and try to get a better understanding of this resource before I adjust the test any further. Looks like there is something I am not understanding about how this should be operating. Thanks! |
@Lucretius 👋 would you be able to reach out? [first name]@[company].[com] |
Sure thing @tombuildsstuff - feel free to reach me at [email protected] |
Looks like this logic was included in a recent pull request, closing this PR. |
This has been released in version 1.28.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 1.28.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
Resolves #3027 by adding the ability to set
express_route_gateway_bypass