Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_network_watcher_flow_log: Add 2 more resource types to target_resource_id #28177

Merged

Conversation

favoretti
Copy link
Collaborator

@favoretti favoretti commented Dec 4, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #28175

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

…get_resource_id`

Added NIC and subnet as accepted value types for `target_resource_id`.

Fixes hashicorp#28175
@favoretti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

$ TF_ACC=1 go test -v ./internal/services/network -timeout=1000m -run='TestAccNetworkWatcher'
=== RUN   TestAccNetworkWatcher
=== RUN   TestAccNetworkWatcher/FlowLog
=== RUN   TestAccNetworkWatcher/FlowLog/basicWithVirtualNetwork
=== RUN   TestAccNetworkWatcher/FlowLog/basicWithSubnet
=== RUN   TestAccNetworkWatcher/FlowLog/basicWithNIC
--- PASS: TestAccNetworkWatcher (494.37s)
    --- PASS: TestAccNetworkWatcher/FlowLog (494.37s)
        --- PASS: TestAccNetworkWatcher/FlowLog/basicWithVirtualNetwork (156.41s)
        --- PASS: TestAccNetworkWatcher/FlowLog/basicWithSubnet (162.19s)
        --- PASS: TestAccNetworkWatcher/FlowLog/basicWithNIC (175.78s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/network	497.081s

@favoretti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Unit tests fail related to ephemeral keyvault somehow...

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @favoretti LGTM 💯

I'll see if I can spot whats up with the unit test GHA

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 4f7f6b7 into hashicorp:main Dec 5, 2024
33 of 34 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.13.0 milestone Dec 5, 2024
stephybun added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
* update for #28158, #28025

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28123

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28105

* Update for #28177

* Update for #28171

* Update for #28178

* Update CHANGELOG.md

---------

Co-authored-by: catriona-m <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kt <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for Subnet scoped VNET flow logs
2 participants