azurerm_application_gateway - support for the Basic SKU

[tedsmitt]

Community Note

• Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
• Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

• I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
• I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
• I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
• I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
• I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

• I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
• I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
• I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.

Testing

• My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

• azurerm_application_gateway - support for the Basic SKU tier

This is a (please select all that apply):

• Bug Fix
• New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
• Enhancement
• Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #25973

[katbyte]

Looks like all the tests are failing with:

------- Stdout: -------
=== RUN   TestAccApplicationGateway_authCertificate
=== PAUSE TestAccApplicationGateway_authCertificate
=== CONT  TestAccApplicationGateway_authCertificate
    testcase.go:173: Step 1/6 error: Error running apply: exit status 1
        
        Error: creating Application Gateway (Subscription: "*******"
        Resource Group Name: "acctestRG-240920034903751201"
        Application Gateway Name: "acctestag-240920034903751201"): performing CreateOrUpdate: unexpected status 400 (400 Bad Request) with error: AppGatewayV1SkuDeprecated: Application Gateway SKU tier Standard has been deprecated. Supported SKU tiers are Standard_v2,WAF_v2. Refer https://aka.ms/V1retirement.
        
          with azurerm_application_gateway.test,
          on terraform_plugin_test.tf line 72, in resource "azurerm_application_gateway" "test":
          72: resource "azurerm_application_gateway" "test" {
        
--- FAIL: TestAccApplicationGateway_authCertificate (181.02s)
FAIL

[tedsmitt]

As per https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/v1-retirement#retirement-timelines it looks like we can no longer deploy V1 SKUs of the application gateway since the 1st Sept.

At the very least we need to remove any acceptance tests that use any V1 SKUs e.g Standard_Small, but the provider should be updated to remove these as valid options.

I believe that this is out of the scope of this PR, so we should raise another to remove this capability. I don't think this is too much effort. @katbyte shall another issue be raised for the removal of these deprecated SKUs?

[katbyte]

@tedsmitt - could you swap the test SKUs to one that will allow them to pass? it's required to be able to test your changes properly for merge

[tedsmitt]

@katbyte I've updated the Acceptance Tests to use the V2 SKU, these should now pass.

[tedsmitt]

@katbyte Any update on whether we can re-test this?

[katbyte]

👋 ran the tests again and it appears to be a different error now :(

------- Stdout: -------
=== RUN   TestAccApplicationGateway_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccApplicationGateway_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccApplicationGateway_requiresImport
    testcase.go:173: Step 1/2 error: Error running apply: exit status 1
        
        Error: creating Application Gateway (Subscription: "*******"
        Resource Group Name: "acctestRG-241016180010215836"
        Application Gateway Name: "acctestag-241016180010215836"): performing CreateOrUpdate: unexpected status 400 (400 Bad Request) with error: ApplicationGatewayRequestRoutingRulePriorityCannotBeEmpty: Priority for the request routing rule /subscriptions/*******/resourceGroups/acctestRG-241016180010215836/providers/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/acctestag-241016180010215836/requestRoutingRules/acctest-vnet-241016180010215836-rqrt cannot be empty. All request routing rules should have a priority defined starting from api-version 2021-08-01
        
          with azurerm_application_gateway.test,
          on terraform_plugin_test.tf line 71, in resource "azurerm_application_gateway" "test":
          71: resource "azurerm_application_gateway" "test" {
        
--- FAIL: TestAccApplicationGateway_requiresImport (202.42s)
FAIL

[tedsmitt]

@katbyte Have pushed some updates that fix the test case resources to be compatible with the v2 SKU. I have re-run some of the tests locally and they are looking better now.

P.S There is an opportunity here to do a bit of code tidy up as there are probably some duplicate tests since removing the old Standard SKU. However, I know this PR is already quite large so I'm hesitant to include those changes here, what do you think?

[katbyte]

Failing tests have gone from 30 to 7! and the remaining ones are failing one main. We would certainly welcome another pr cleaning up and fixing the remaining 7 but as this is enough for me to see your PR works + the remaining 7 are failing in main and seem unrelated to this change lets get this in for this weeks release LGTM 🍓

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.