Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_security_center_storage_defender: add scan_results_event_grid_topic_id property #26599

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

patst
Copy link
Contributor

@patst patst commented Jul 11, 2024

Add scan_results_event_grid_topic_id property to azurerm_security_center_storage_defender resource.

Closes: #23607

(The Github issue has an additional comment asking for the scan_results_log_analytics_workspace_id property as well. This is not included in this PR, because the current API-Version does not support that. It would involve an API-Version upgrade, which can be done separated from this change.

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #23607

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Signed-off-by: patst <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this PR @patst. A few minor adjustments are needed, but otherwise this is looking good!

@patst
Copy link
Contributor Author

patst commented Jul 12, 2024

Thanks for this PR @patst. A few minor adjustments are needed, but otherwise this is looking good!

@stephybun thanks for the review! I applied the requested changes

@patst
Copy link
Contributor Author

patst commented Jul 12, 2024

the unit tests pass locally on my client. Maybe an issue with the pipeline run? I am unsure what the exact issue is

@patst
Copy link
Contributor Author

patst commented Jul 26, 2024

@stephybun don't want to stress you, but if you see anything still missing give me a sign :-)

Thanks for your help!

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@patst the acceptance tests are currently failing with the following error:

        Error: creating Scope (Scope: "/subscriptions/*******/resourceGroups/acctestRG-storage-240729064442070764/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/acctestacc7su6p"): unexpected status 400 (400 Bad Request) with error: BadRequest: ScanResultsEventGridTopicResourceId can't be set if OnUpload.IsEnabled is false
          with azurerm_security_center_storage_defender.test,
          on terraform_plugin_test.tf line 45, in resource "azurerm_security_center_storage_defender" "test":
          45: resource "azurerm_security_center_storage_defender" "test" {
        creating Scope (Scope:
        "/subscriptions/*******/resourceGroups/acctestRG-storage-240729064442070764/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/acctestacc7su6p"):
        unexpected status 400 (400 Bad Request) with error: BadRequest:
        ScanResultsEventGridTopicResourceId can't be set if OnUpload.IsEnabled is
        false

I left a suggestion in line on what I think might fix the problem.

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/M and removed size/S labels Jul 30, 2024
@patst
Copy link
Contributor Author

patst commented Aug 2, 2024

@patst the acceptance tests are currently failing with the following error:

        Error: creating Scope (Scope: "/subscriptions/*******/resourceGroups/acctestRG-storage-240729064442070764/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/acctestacc7su6p"): unexpected status 400 (400 Bad Request) with error: BadRequest: ScanResultsEventGridTopicResourceId can't be set if OnUpload.IsEnabled is false
          with azurerm_security_center_storage_defender.test,
          on terraform_plugin_test.tf line 45, in resource "azurerm_security_center_storage_defender" "test":
          45: resource "azurerm_security_center_storage_defender" "test" {
        creating Scope (Scope:
        "/subscriptions/*******/resourceGroups/acctestRG-storage-240729064442070764/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/acctestacc7su6p"):
        unexpected status 400 (400 Bad Request) with error: BadRequest:
        ScanResultsEventGridTopicResourceId can't be set if OnUpload.IsEnabled is
        false

I left a suggestion in line on what I think might fix the problem.

@stephybun can you rerun the integration tests?

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests are looking good now, thanks @patst LGTM 👍

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 3454a86 into hashicorp:main Aug 7, 2024
35 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.115.0 milestone Aug 7, 2024
stephybun added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 7, 2024

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 7, 2024
@patst patst deleted the 23607/storage-defender branch January 8, 2025 08:07
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add scan_results_eventgrid_topic_id argument in azurerm_security_center_storage_defender resource
2 participants