Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_redis_cache_access_policy - remove ForceNew from permissions #26440

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

sinbai
Copy link
Contributor

@sinbai sinbai commented Jun 24, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

After validating the behavior of the API, the permissions is allowed to be updated. Submit this PR to remove the ForceNew for permissions to fix #26390

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

PASS: TestAccRedisCacheAccessPolicy_update (2489.80s)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #26390

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @sinbai, one minor comment on the error message otherwise this should be good to go!

}

if existing.Model == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("retrieving %s: model was nil", *id)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return fmt.Errorf("retrieving %s: model was nil", *id)
return fmt.Errorf("retrieving %s: `model` was nil", *id)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

@sinbai
Copy link
Contributor Author

sinbai commented Jun 25, 2024

Thanks @sinbai, one minor comment on the error message otherwise this should be good to go!

Hi @stephybun thanks for your feedback. I have updated the code. Could you please take another look?

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @sinbai LGTM 👍

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 244bf68 into hashicorp:main Jun 25, 2024
35 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.110.0 milestone Jun 25, 2024
stephybun added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
dduportal pushed a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>changes detected:&#xA;&#x9;&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from
&#34;3.109.0&#34; to &#34;3.110.0&#34; in file
&#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.110.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.110.0&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;*
**New Data Source:** `azurerm_load_test`
([#26376](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26376
**New Resource:**
`azurerm_virtual_desktop_scaling_plan_host_pool_association`
([#24670](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24670))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
Data Source: `azurerm_monitor_data_collection_endpoint` - support for
the `immutable_id` property
([#26380](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26380
Data Source: `azurerm_nginx_certificate` - export the properties
`sha1_thumbprint`, `key_vault_secret_version`,
`key_vault_secret_creation_date`, `error_code` and `error_message`
([#26160](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26160
`azurerm_backup_policy_vm` - support for the `tiering_policy` property
([#26263](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26263
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster_node_pool` - Pod Disruption Budgets are now
respected when deleting a node pool
([#26471](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26471
`azurerm_monitor_data_collection_endpoint` - support for the
`immutable_id` property
([#26380](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26380
`azurerm_mssql_managed_instance` - support the value `GZRS` for the
`storage_account_type` property
([#26448](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26448
`azurerm_mssql_managed_instance_transparent_data_encryption` - support
for the `managed_hsm_key_id` property
([#26496](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26496
`azurerm_redis_cache_access_policy` - allow updates to `permissions`
([#26440](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26440
`azurerm_redhat_openshift_cluster` - support for the
`managed_resource_group_name` property
([#25529](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25529
`azurerm_redhat_openshift_cluster` - support for the
`preconfigured_network_security_group_enabled` property
([#26082](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26082
`azurerm_iotcentral_application` - remove Computed from `template` and
set default of `[email protected]` in 4.0
([#26485](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26485
`azurerm_digital_twins_time_series_database_connection` - remove
Computed from `kusto_table_name` and set a default of
`AdtPropertyEvents` in 4.0
([#26484](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26484))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* Data Source: `azurerm_express_route_circuit_peering` -
fix issue where data source attempts to parse an empty string instead of
generating the resource ID
([#26441](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26441
`azurerm_express_route_gateway` - prevent a panic
([#26467](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26467
`azurerm_monitor_scheduled_query_rules_alert_v2` - correctly handle the
`identity` block if not specified
([#26364](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26364
`azurerm_security_center_automation` - prevent resource recreation when
`tags` are updated
([#26292](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26292
`azurerm_synapse_workspace` - fix issue where `azure_devops_repo` or
`github_repo` configuration could not be removed
([#26421](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26421
`azurerm_virtual_network_dns_servers` - split create and update function
to fix lifecycle - ignore
([#26427](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26427
`azurerm_linux_function_app` - set `allowed_applications` in the request
payload
([#26462](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26462
`azurerm_linux_function_app_slot` - set `allowed_applications` in the
request payload
([#26462](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26462
`azurerm_windows_function_app` - set `allowed_applications` in the
request payload
([#26462](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26462
`azurerm_windows_function_app_slot` - set `allowed_applications` in the
request payload
([#26462](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26462
`azurerm_linux_web_app` - set `allowed_applications` in the request
payload
([#26462](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26462
`azurerm_linux_web_app_slot` - set `allowed_applications` in the request
payload
([#26462](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26462
`azurerm_windows_web_app` - set `allowed_applications` in the request
payload
([#26462](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26462
`azurerm_windows_web_app_slot` - set `allowed_applications` in the
request payload
([#26462](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26462
`azurerm_api_management` - remove ForceNew from
`additional_location.zones`
([#26384](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26384
`azurerm_logic_app_integration_account_schema` - the `name` property now
allows underscores
([#26475](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26475
`azurerm_palo_alto_local_rulestack_rule` - prevent error when switching
between `protocol` and `protocol_ports`
([#26490](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26490))&#xA;&#xA;DEPRECATIONS:&#xA;&#xA;*
`azurerm_analysis_service_server` - the property
`enable_power_bi_service` has been superseded by
`power_bi_service_enabled`
([#26456](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26456))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/updatecli/job/azure/job/main/287/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <[email protected]>
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 26, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Access policy is replaced when permissions are changed
2 participants