azurerm_sentinel_alert_rule_scheduled - remove forcenew for alert_rule_template_version

[ziyeqf]

Community Note

• Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

remove the forcenew property for alert_rule_template_version. As per testing it's not required now.

PR Checklist

• I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
• I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
• I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
• I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
• I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
  For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here”

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

• I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
• I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
• I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
• (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

• My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

❯❯ tftest sentinel TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled        
=== RUN   TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_basic
=== RUN   TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_upgrade
=== PAUSE TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_upgrade
=== RUN   TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_complete
=== PAUSE TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_complete
=== RUN   TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_update
=== PAUSE TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_update
=== RUN   TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport
=== RUN   TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_withAlertRuleTemplateGuid
=== PAUSE TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_withAlertRuleTemplateGuid
=== RUN   TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_updateEventGroupingSetting
=== PAUSE TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_updateEventGroupingSetting
=== CONT  TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_basic
=== CONT  TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_updateEventGroupingSetting
=== CONT  TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_complete
=== CONT  TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_upgrade
=== CONT  TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_withAlertRuleTemplateGuid
=== CONT  TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_update
=== NAME  TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport
    testing_new.go:90: Error running post-test destroy, there may be dangling resources: exit status 1
        
        Error: deleting Solution (Subscription: "*****"
        Resource Group Name: "acctestRG-sentinel-240422142804380013"
        Solution Name: "SecurityInsights(acctestLAW-240422142804380013)"): performing Delete: unexpected status 204 (204 No Content) received with no body
        
        deleting Solution (Subscription: "*****"
        Resource Group Name: "acctestRG-sentinel-240422142804380013"
        Solution Name: "SecurityInsights(acctestLAW-240422142804380013)"): performing
        Delete: unexpected status 204 (204 No Content) received with no body
--- FAIL: TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport (143.33s)
--- PASS: TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_complete (287.05s)
--- PASS: TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_basic (289.01s)
--- PASS: TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_withAlertRuleTemplateGuid (289.63s)
--- PASS: TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_updateEventGroupingSetting (362.60s)
--- PASS: TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_upgrade (370.77s)
--- PASS: TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_update (429.31s)
FAIL
FAIL	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/sentinel	429.385s
FAIL

rerun the failed one

❯❯ tftest sentinel TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport
=== RUN   TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport
--- PASS: TestAccSentinelAlertRuleScheduled_requiresImport (206.98s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/sentinel	207.060s

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

azurerm_sentinel_alert_rule_scheduled - remove forcenew for alert_rule_template_version [GH-25688]

This is a (please select all that apply):

• Bug Fix
• New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
• Enhancement
• Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #25564

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

[jackofallops]

Hi @ziyeqf - Thanks for this PR. It looks mostly fine, but one comment below to take a look at if you could?

Thanks

[jackofallops]

Is there a reason not to just use a string here and avoid complication of the bool to string evaluation, and be able to provide values in the calling test? e.g.

Suggested change

	func (r SentinelAlertRuleScheduledResource) upgradeVersion(data acceptance.TestData, update bool) string {
	version := "1.0.4"
	if update {
	version = "1.0.5"
	}
	return fmt.Sprintf(`
	func (r SentinelAlertRuleScheduledResource) upgradeVersion(data acceptance.TestData, version string) string {
	return fmt.Sprintf(`

[stephybun]

Thanks @ziyeqf LGTM 👍

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.