-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
new resources: azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule azurerm_datadog_monitor_sso_configuration #17825
Conversation
@mbfrahry , this the continuation PR of "azurerm_datadog_monitor" with child resources. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this PR! 👍
I've taken a look through the documentation and naming stuff, left some comments inline. These comments are mainly for the consistency across the provider codebase.
@magodo have addressed all the comments |
@mbfrahry can we get assignee on this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vikotha Thank you for the update! I've left some more comments about the documents of these two resources. Once they are resolved, I'll move on reviewing the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hey @vikotha
Thanks for this PR - I've taken a look through and left a few design comments inline, but ultimately I think this resource wants to be embedded within the DataDog Monitor resource, since there appears to be a 1:1 relationship between these - which means this could become a block within that resource since it's related configuration. WDYT?
Thanks!
internal/services/datadog/azurerm_datadog_monitor_sso_configuration.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/datadog/azurerm_datadog_monitor_sso_configuration.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Thanks @vikotha - looks like we have some test failures still: |
Is this failing locally? I see all checks successful in the pipeline. In my local run as well, everything passed. |
@vikotha - this is in our CI server were we run the tests against our azure test subscription - maybe the sku you are using is not available/something needs to be done to enableit? |
still failing 😞
|
@katbyte , this should work now. If the env variables are not defined the above error is expected. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @vikotha ! LGTM now 🌵
This functionality has been released in v3.29.0 of the Terraform Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you! |
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
The previous merge for datadog monitor plugin: #16131