private_ip_address not filled in azurerm_network_interface resource and datasource

[NilsBusche]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Terraform (and AzureRM Provider) Version

Terraform v0.12.12
terraform-provider-azurerm_v1.34.0_x4

Affected Resource(s)

Resource azurerm_network_interface
Datasource azurerm_network_interface

Terraform Configuration Files

resource "azurerm_network_interface" "nic_0" {
  name                = "${var.hostname}-nic_0"
  location            = data.azurerm_resource_group.rg_vm.location
  resource_group_name = data.azurerm_resource_group.rg_vm.name

  ip_configuration {
    name                          = "ip-configuration"
    subnet_id                     = data.azurerm_subnet.subnet.id
    private_ip_address_allocation = "dynamic"
    primary                       = "true"
  }
  ip_configuration {
    name                          = "ip-configuration2"
    subnet_id                     = data.azurerm_subnet.subnet.id
    private_ip_address_allocation = "dynamic"
  }
}

data "azurerm_network_interface" "nic_0" {
  name                = "${var.hostname}-nic_0"
  resource_group_name = data.azurerm_resource_group.rg_vm.name
}

output "resource_ip_configuration" {
   value = azurerm_network_interface.nic_0.ip_configuration
}

output "data_ip_configuration" {
   value = data.azurerm_network_interface.nic_0.ip_configuration
}

Expected Behavior

All Attributes of ìp_configuration` should be filled and shown in outputs.

Actual Behavior

private_ip_address is not filled:

data_ip_configuration = [
  {
    "application_gateway_backend_address_pools_ids" = []
    "application_security_group_ids" = []
    "load_balancer_backend_address_pools_ids" = []
    "load_balancer_inbound_nat_rules_ids" = []
    "name" = "ip-configuration"
    "primary" = true
    "private_ip_address" = ""
    "private_ip_address_allocation" = "dynamic"
    "private_ip_address_version" = "IPv4"
    "public_ip_address_id" = ""
    "subnet_id" = "/subscriptions/[...]"
  },
  {
    "application_gateway_backend_address_pools_ids" = []
    "application_security_group_ids" = []
    "load_balancer_backend_address_pools_ids" = []
    "load_balancer_inbound_nat_rules_ids" = []
    "name" = "ip-configuration2"
    "primary" = false
    "private_ip_address" = ""
    "private_ip_address_allocation" = "dynamic"
    "private_ip_address_version" = "IPv4"
    "public_ip_address_id" = ""
    "subnet_id" = "/subscriptions/[...]"
  },
]

resource_ip_configuration = [
  {
    "application_gateway_backend_address_pools_ids" = []
    "application_security_group_ids" = []
    "load_balancer_backend_address_pools_ids" = []
    "load_balancer_inbound_nat_rules_ids" = []
    "name" = "ip-configuration"
    "primary" = true
    "private_ip_address" = ""
    "private_ip_address_allocation" = "dynamic"
    "private_ip_address_version" = "IPv4"
    "public_ip_address_id" = ""
    "subnet_id" = "/subscriptions/[...]"
  },
  {
    "application_gateway_backend_address_pools_ids" = []
    "application_security_group_ids" = []
    "load_balancer_backend_address_pools_ids" = []
    "load_balancer_inbound_nat_rules_ids" = []
    "name" = "ip-configuration2"
    "primary" = false
    "private_ip_address" = ""
    "private_ip_address_allocation" = "dynamic"
    "private_ip_address_version" = "IPv4"
    "public_ip_address_id" = ""
    "subnet_id" = "/subscriptions/[...]"
  },
]

Steps to Reproduce

terraform apply

[ghost]

This has been released in version 1.37.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 1.37.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!