Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Resource: azurerm_data_protection_backup_instance_mysql_flexible_server #27464

Merged

Conversation

neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor

@neil-yechenwei neil-yechenwei commented Sep 23, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

This PR is to support Data Protection Backup Instance for MySQL FS.

API Reference: https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/tree/main/specification/dataprotection/resource-manager/Microsoft.DataProtection/stable/2024-04-01

Overview: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/postgresql/flexible-server/concepts-backup-restore#long-term-retention-preview

Note: This PR is referring the existing Backup Instances in RP https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/tree/main/internal/services/dataprotection.

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

image
image

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • New Resource: azurerm_data_protection_backup_instance_mysql_flexible_server

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Copy link
Contributor

@ms-zhenhua ms-zhenhua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @neil-yechenwei,
Thanks for this PR - I've taken a look through and left some comments inline. If we can fix those up, this should be good to go 👍

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

neil-yechenwei commented Sep 24, 2024

@ms-zhenhua , thanks for the comments. I updated PR. Please take another look.

Below is the latest test result I just now triggered.
image

@ms-zhenhua
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @neil-yechenwei , thank you for your update. LGTM~

@neil-yechenwei neil-yechenwei marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2024 03:17
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test failure

------- Stdout: -------
=== RUN   TestAccDataProtectionBackupInstanceMySQLFlexibleServer_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccDataProtectionBackupInstanceMySQLFlexibleServer_basic
=== CONT  TestAccDataProtectionBackupInstanceMySQLFlexibleServer_basic
    testcase.go:173: Step 1/3 error: Error running apply: exit status 1
        
        Error: creating Flexible Server (Subscription: "*******"
        Resource Group Name: "acctest-dataprotection-241016175940838067"
        Flexible Server Name: "acctest-mysqlfs-241016175940838067"): polling after Create: polling failed: the Azure API returned the following error:
        
        Status: "ZoneNotAvailableForRegion"
        Code: ""
        Message: "The requested size for resource is currently not available in this zone. Please try another zone or deploy to a different location"
        Activity Id: ""
        
        ---
        
        API Response:
        
        ----[start]----
        {"name":"d4b8a22a-f57b-4863-965a-cf540392eb18","status":"Failed","startTime":"2024-10-16T18:00:08.933Z","error":{"code":"ZoneNotAvailableForRegion","message":"The requested size for resource is currently not available in this zone. Please try another zone or deploy to a different location"}}
        -----[end]-----
        
        
          with azurerm_mysql_flexible_server.test,
          on terraform_plugin_test.tf line 37, in resource "azurerm_mysql_flexible_server" "test":
          37: resource "azurerm_mysql_flexible_server" "test" {
        
--- FAIL: TestAccDataProtectionBackupInstanceMySQLFlexibleServer_basic (223.58s)
FAIL

@neil-yechenwei neil-yechenwei force-pushed the dataprotectionbackupinstanceformysqlfs branch from f7ebf2f to 66f37c5 Compare October 17, 2024 05:16
@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

neil-yechenwei commented Oct 17, 2024

@katbyte , I updated PR. Please take another look. Below is the test result that I just now triggered.

image
image
image

@katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

katbyte commented Oct 29, 2024

@neil-yechenwei - went to test this and the build failed for tc due to an API upgrade on main

 data_protection_backup_instance_mysql_flexible_server_resource.go:17:2: cannot find module providing package github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk/resource-manager/mysql/2022-01-01/servers: import lookup disabled by -mod=vendor
[08:57:37][Step 4/5] 	(Go version in go.mod is at least 1.14 and vendor directory exists.)

you'll need to merge main and resolve conflicts

@neil-yechenwei neil-yechenwei requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2024 01:17
@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@katbyte , I merged latest change. Below is the latest test result I just now triggered.

image
image

Note: the failure of CI check is not related with this PR.

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks LGTM 🚂

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 702bcc7 into hashicorp:main Nov 5, 2024
33 checks passed
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.9.0 milestone Nov 5, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 7, 2024

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 7, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants