-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
azurerm_virtual_network_gateway
- update the resource with existing Nat Rules
#25690
Conversation
773611b
to
2a6c53b
Compare
f01a77e
to
a7284af
Compare
9343cd0
to
a7284af
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @neil-yechenwei - Thanks for this PR. It looks OK in principal, but since the resource uses a combined CreateUpdate
the code will fail to check the err as it stands. Can you take a look at reworking this to ensure that error handling for the Get is performed for both call types?
Thanks!
@@ -657,8 +657,8 @@ func resourceVirtualNetworkGatewayCreateUpdate(d *pluginsdk.ResourceData, meta i | |||
|
|||
id := parse.NewVirtualNetworkGatewayID(subscriptionId, d.Get("resource_group_name").(string), d.Get("name").(string)) | |||
|
|||
existing, err := client.Get(ctx, id.ResourceGroup, id.Name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will not handle the value for err
in the update case, can you take a look at implementing differently to make sure error checking is done in both cases?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated
@jackofallops , thanks for the comments. I updated PR. Please take another look. The test cases in below latest test result that I just now re-triggered are also failed with same error in Teamcity Daily run. So they're not related with this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @neil-yechenwei - Thanks for the changes, this LGTM now 👍
<Actions> <action id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8"> <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3> <details id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24"> <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary> <p>changes detected:
	"hashicorp/azurerm" updated from "3.100.0" to "3.101.0" in file ".terraform.lock.hcl"</p> <details> <summary>3.101.0</summary> <pre>Changelog retrieved from:
	https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.101.0
ENHANCEMENTS:

* dependencies: updating to `v0.20240424.1114424` of `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#25749](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25749 dependencies: updating to `v0.27.0` of `github.com/tombuildsstuff/giovanni` ([#25702](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25702 dependencies: updating `golang.org/x/net` to `0.23.0`
* `azurerm_cognitive_account` - the `kind` property now supports `ConversationalLanguageUnderstanding` ([#25735](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25735 `azurerm_container_app_custom_domain` - support the ability to use Azure Managed Certificates ([#25356](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25356))

BUG FIXES:

* Data Source: `azurerm_application_insights` - set correct AppID in data source ([#25687](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25687 `azurerm_virtual_network` - suppress diff in ordering for `address_space` due to inconsistent API response ([#23793](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23793 `azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_filesystem` - add context deadline for import ([#25712](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25712 `azurerm_virtual_network_gateway` - preserve existing `nat_rules` on updates ([#25690](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25690))


</pre> </details> </details> <a href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/updatecli/job/azure/job/main/135/">Jenkins pipeline link</a> </action> </Actions> --- <table> <tr> <td width="77"> <img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli logo" width="50" height="50"> </td> <td> <p> Created automatically by <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a> </p> <details><summary>Options:</summary> <br /> <p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its manifest(s)</a>.</p> <ul> <li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen it, the next time it runs.</li> <li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li> </ul> <p> Feel free to report any issues at <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br /> If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on our <a href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>! </p> </details> </td> </tr> </table> Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <[email protected]>
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Community Note
Description
Currently,
azurerm_virtual_network_gateway
would always delete the nat rules of Virtual Network Gateway when updating any property of Virtual Network Gateway. Because the nat rules of Virtual Network Gateway is managed byazurerm_virtual_network_gateway_nat_rule
andazurerm_virtual_network_gateway
doesn't handle the nat rule in the update operation so thatazurerm_virtual_network_gateway
would always delete the nat rules.The test cases in below latest test result are also failed with same error in Teamcity Daily run. So they're not related with this PR.
PR Checklist
For example: “
resource_name_here
- description of change e.g. adding propertynew_property_name_here
”Changes to existing Resource / Data Source
Testing
Change Log
Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.
This is a (please select all that apply):
Related Issue(s)
Fixes #25683
Note
If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.