Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: Exclusive Relationship Management Resources #39204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

jar-b
Copy link
Member

@jar-b jar-b commented Sep 6, 2024

Description

A proposal describing the use case for "exclusive relationship management" resources and their function within the Terraform AWS provider.

For a more reader friendly version, refer to the markdown file on the branch.

Relations

Relates #39203
Relates #22336

@jar-b jar-b added the proposal Proposes new design or functionality. label Sep 6, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

@github-actions github-actions bot added documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. prioritized Part of the maintainer teams immediate focus. To be addressed within the current quarter. labels Sep 6, 2024
@jar-b jar-b marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2024 20:35
@jar-b jar-b requested a review from a team as a code owner September 6, 2024 20:35
Copy link
Member

@breathingdust breathingdust left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nicely written. LGTM 🚀

Copy link
Member

@YakDriver YakDriver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

@jar-b jar-b merged commit 6b9e61f into main Sep 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@jar-b jar-b deleted the d-exclusive-relationship-designdoc branch September 16, 2024 19:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.68.0 milestone Sep 16, 2024
@lorengordon
Copy link
Contributor

Yes yes yes!

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the prioritized Part of the maintainer teams immediate focus. To be addressed within the current quarter. label Sep 20, 2024
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v5.68.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. proposal Proposes new design or functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants