Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New bootstrap_brokers_attached_enis output for aws_msk_cluster #20940

Closed
e-moshaya opened this issue Sep 17, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #20615
Closed

New bootstrap_brokers_attached_enis output for aws_msk_cluster #20940

e-moshaya opened this issue Sep 17, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #20615
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/kafka Issues and PRs that pertain to the kafka service.
Milestone

Comments

@e-moshaya
Copy link

e-moshaya commented Sep 17, 2021

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

I am Trying to integrate MSK with NLB for privatelink connectivity using the steps laid out here. This requires me to add each Kafka broker ip address to the NLB target group. For that to work, I will need to get the attached eni id for each broker which is available in the AWS Console via the broker details section.

image

New or Affected Resource(s)

  • aws_msk_list_nodes

Potential Terraform Configuration

resource "aws_msk_list_nodes" "example" {
  cluster_arn           = aws_msk_cluster.example.arn
}

References

@e-moshaya e-moshaya added the enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. label Sep 17, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. service/kafka Issues and PRs that pertain to the kafka service. labels Sep 17, 2021
@e-moshaya
Copy link
Author

On second thoughts, I think the list nodes data resource is what we need. Here is the CLI equivalent https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/reference/kafka/list-nodes.html

@ewbankkit ewbankkit removed the needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. label Sep 17, 2021
@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

ewbankkit commented Sep 17, 2021

@e-moshaya Thanks for raising this issue.
It has already been noticed in #11085. I'm going to close this one as a duplicate so that we can concentrate discussion in the linked issue.
Please add any additional comments there.

Actually this isn't identical to #11085 (that issue is about broker node IP addresses) although it is similar.
It looks like #20615 will address this.

@github-actions
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v3.60.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2022

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/kafka Issues and PRs that pertain to the kafka service.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants