Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(docs): product relative links #3401

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

fix(docs): product relative links #3401

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

ansgarm
Copy link
Member

@ansgarm ansgarm commented Jan 9, 2024

Closes #2816

  • fix(docs): Add override to ensure function bindings docs don't have relative links without the terraform product prefix in them
  • fix(docs): update API docs

Copy link
Contributor

@DanielMSchmidt DanielMSchmidt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you planning an upstream change in terraform as well?

@ansgarm ansgarm changed the title fix product relative links fix(docs): product relative links Jan 9, 2024
@ansgarm
Copy link
Member Author

ansgarm commented Jan 9, 2024

Are you planning an upstream change in terraform as well?

Good idea..

edit: here it is: hashicorp/terraform#34510

@ansgarm ansgarm added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 9, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 9, 2024
@ansgarm ansgarm added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 10, 2024
@ansgarm ansgarm merged commit 703bb69 into main Jan 10, 2024
467 of 497 checks passed
@ansgarm ansgarm deleted the fix-product-relative-links branch January 10, 2024 12:29
ansgarm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2024
## 0.20.1

**AWS Provider changes (breaking)**

The AWS pre-built provider for Go is currently too large to be installed
due to a hard limit in Go. This release adds skipping the `statement`
block in the `rule` block of the `aws_wafv2_web_acl` and
`aws_wafv2_rule_group` resources. Our [resource docs
page](https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/cdktf/concepts/resources#special-cases)
previously already mentioned that these resources have skipped
attributes but they weren't actually skipped. This almost doubled AWS
provider bindings in size due to the recursive nature of the `statement`
block.
If you are using any of these two resources, the `statement` now has to
be passed as a plain object instead and its keys have to be snake-cased
(e.g. `and_statement` or `regex_match_statement`).

### feat

- feat(hcl2cdk): support import blocks in cdktf convert
[\#3415](#3415)

### fix

- fix(provider-generator): Skip `statement` block for `rule` block in
`aws_wafv2_web_acl` and `aws_wafv2_rule_group` resources
[\#3414](#3414)
- fix(cli): Fix version range matching for 0.x version ranges with the
~> operator
[\#3403](#3403)
- fix(docs): fix complex iterator example
[\#3410](#3410)
- fix(docs): product relative links
[\#3401](#3401)

### chore

- chore: Upgrade dependencies for @cdktf/provider-generator
[\#3423](#3423)
- chore: break loop properly
[\#3413](#3413)
- chore: abort rebase when retrying pushing doc updates
[\#3412](#3412)
- chore: update registry docs tool
[\#3407](#3407)
- chore: update registry docs tool
[\#3406](#3406)
- chore: update provider docs tool
[\#3404](#3404)
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you've found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 10, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resolve content check errors from 0.16 release PR
2 participants