fix: Allow the HBar Rate Limiter to be disabled.

[ebadiere]

This fix allows the HBar Rate Limiter to be disabled by setting the HBAR_RATE_LIMIT_TINYBAR to 0

Related issue(s):

Fixes #3251

Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[github-actions]

Test Results

    4 files  +    3    421 suites  +414   27s ⏱️ -3s
1 494 tests +1 489  1 493 ✅ +1 489  1 💤 +1  0 ❌  - 1 
1 503 runs  +1 467  1 502 ✅ +1 467  1 💤 +1  0 ❌  - 1 

Results for commit bfa8093. ± Comparison against base commit ce43b76.

This pull request removes 5 and adds 1494 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

"before all" hook in "@api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests "before all" hook in "@api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests"
@release-light, @release should execute "eth_getTransactionReceipt" for hash of 2930 transaction ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-1 RPC Server Acceptance Tests RPC Server Acceptance Tests Transaction related RPC Calls @release-light, @release should execute "eth_getTransactionReceipt" for hash of 2930 transaction
@release-light, @release should execute "eth_getTransactionReceipt" for hash of London transaction ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-1 RPC Server Acceptance Tests RPC Server Acceptance Tests Transaction related RPC Calls @release-light, @release should execute "eth_getTransactionReceipt" for hash of London transaction
@release-light, @release should execute "eth_getTransactionReceipt" for hash of legacy transaction ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-1 RPC Server Acceptance Tests RPC Server Acceptance Tests Transaction related RPC Calls @release-light, @release should execute "eth_getTransactionReceipt" for hash of legacy transaction
@release-light, @release should execute "eth_sendRawTransaction" for legacy EIP 155 transactions ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-1 RPC Server Acceptance Tests RPC Server Acceptance Tests Transaction related RPC Calls @release-light, @release should execute "eth_sendRawTransaction" for legacy EIP 155 transactions

"eth_blockNumber" return the latest block number on second try ‑ @ethGetBlockByNumber using MirrorNode "eth_blockNumber" return the latest block number on second try
"eth_blockNumber" should return the latest block number using cache ‑ @ethGetBlockByNumber using MirrorNode "eth_blockNumber" should return the latest block number using cache
"eth_blockNumber" should return the latest block number ‑ @ethGetBlockByNumber using MirrorNode "eth_blockNumber" should return the latest block number
"eth_blockNumber" should throw an error if no blocks are found after third try ‑ @ethGetBlockByNumber using MirrorNode "eth_blockNumber" should throw an error if no blocks are found after third try
"eth_blockNumber" should throw an error if no blocks are found ‑ @ethGetBlockByNumber using MirrorNode "eth_blockNumber" should throw an error if no blocks are found
Adds a revertReason field for receipts with errorMessage ‑ @ethGetTransactionReceipt eth_getTransactionReceipt tests Adds a revertReason field for receipts with errorMessage
BLOCK_HASH filter timeouts and throws the expected error ‑ @ethGetLogs using MirrorNode timeout BLOCK_HASH filter timeouts and throws the expected error
BLOCK_HASH filter ‑ @ethGetLogs using MirrorNode BLOCK_HASH filter
Can extract the account number out of an account pagination next link url ‑ MirrorNodeClient Can extract the account number out of an account pagination next link url
Can extract the evm address out of an account pagination next link url ‑ MirrorNodeClient Can extract the evm address out of an account pagination next link url
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[Nana-EC]

Good approach.
Question on the config changes.
Also I provided a suggestion to be a bit more strict

[mishomihov00]

Reviewed and approved only this file:
.github/workflows/acceptance.yml

[quiet-node]

LGTM jsut some comments to clean up code

[Nana-EC]

LG, see note on config issue to open

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[quiet-node]

LGTM! Great work!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.88889% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.33%. Comparing base (264d2cb) to head (bfa8093).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
packages/relay/src/lib/constants.ts	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3252      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.85%   81.33%   +3.47%     
==========================================
  Files          66       69       +3     
  Lines        4453     4629     +176     
  Branches      993     1041      +48     
==========================================
+ Hits         3467     3765     +298     
+ Misses        613      516      -97     
+ Partials      373      348      -25     

Flag	Coverage Δ
config-service	98.14% <ø> (ø)
relay	78.63% <88.88%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
server	83.28% <ø> (ø)
ws-server	36.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...s/relay/src/lib/services/hbarLimitService/index.ts	92.70% <100.00%> (+9.75%)	⬆️
packages/relay/src/lib/constants.ts	90.19% <0.00%> (+3.92%)	⬆️

... and 19 files with indirect coverage changes